Recently I have been interested in Joseph Smith Jr, thanks to the excellent missionary work of the Mormons. Before people think I've gone off the deep end, let me reassure them: as a Buddhist, it is my duty to explore non-Buddhist religions so as to see what good they have may be reflected in my understanding of the world.
Having said that, I have read about the history of the Mormons. So this articles is about his "many gods" revelation. I will not be discussing polygamy here, but will declare that it was possibly a means of survival for the early Church of Christ of the Latter Day Saints.
One sign that Joseph Smith Jr might have been making his brand offolk Christianity was when he came up with the "many gods" ideology.
However, the "many gods" ideology isn't anti-Christian. It's just confusing to monotheistic notions of the one true God Almighty.
If you are of that kind of a person, then it will be hard to explain panentheism and the Hindu Pantheon, because most monotheists are ignorant of the fact that "deities" is akin to Elohim and the Muslim "We" which represents the "all things that are God".
Indeed, nobody will understand what I just said because it is simpler to think of one God rather than a God who has avatars who are merely reflections of all of His qualities.
Joseph Smith Jr realized this, too. However, this was too much for some of his Christian neighbours in Nuavoo, Illinois, who lynched him merely for having a novel interpretation of the Bible.
However, Smith wasn't referring to deities or gods, he was referring to the prophets and other people like Esther and Rebecca in the Bible. That this irked other God-loving people in Illinois is understandable since they had the notion that the First Commandment was vital to keeping the peace among their fellow Christians.
However, Brigham Young not only kept the polygamy part of Smith's works, he also allowed the "many gods" ideology morph into "baptism for the dead", which seems to me to be a way of relieving Mormon anxiety about dead loved ones who aren't Mormons. It also verges on ancestor worship, which is not strange at all and is probably Mormon in the sense that Smith almost worshipped all the people depicted in the Bible from Adam to Jesus and Mary to John.
At least, that is my understanding of what I read about Mormon history. If anyone who is Mormon wishes to correct me, then please do.
Inspired by the Journey to the West, Gandhara is devoted to both Western and Eastern Truth.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ - Hail the Lord whose name eliminates spiritual darkness.
Om Ganeshaya Namaha (ॐ गणेशाय नमः) - Homage to Ganesha.
Unconditional love tranquilizes the mind, and thus conquers all.
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label deities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deities. Show all posts
20140529
The Many Gods of Early Mormonism (satire)
Labels:
Bible,
deities,
Joseph Smith Jr,
Mormon,
panentheism,
satire
20040321
World religions as Psychological States of Mind
Here are my thoughts based on a thorough understanding of psychology with study of world religions.
IMHO deities are aspects (psychological states) of the mind.
Thus dieties such as gods and goddesses of various Western and Eastern mythologies, the Buddhas and their consorts (as in the Tibetan Buddhist Vajrayana path), the Judeo-Christian angels, God, Jesus, the Devil, and Satan, etc. reflect psychological states of consciousness.
Gods and goddesses represent various human qualities of kindness, virtue etc.
While the Buddhist dieties represent Eastern concepts of the same qualities in a non-dual holism, the Judeo-Christian dieties represent a duality that shows syncretist influence from other religions such as Zoroasterianism and paganism.
Western philosophy and religion emphasize logic with a rigid "either-or" paradigm.
Eastern philosophy emphasizes a free-flowing non-dual holistic approach that embraces even Western concepts.
Overall though, I don't feel comfortable with the logical/rational Western aspect of religion with the either-or paradigm.
The non-dual holistic approach of the Eastern philosophies appeal to me, because it supports a broader worldview, especially the Hindu concept of infinite consciousness.
Suggested reading:
Tibetan Book of the Dead by Fremantle and Chogyam Trungpa
IMHO deities are aspects (psychological states) of the mind.
Thus dieties such as gods and goddesses of various Western and Eastern mythologies, the Buddhas and their consorts (as in the Tibetan Buddhist Vajrayana path), the Judeo-Christian angels, God, Jesus, the Devil, and Satan, etc. reflect psychological states of consciousness.
Gods and goddesses represent various human qualities of kindness, virtue etc.
While the Buddhist dieties represent Eastern concepts of the same qualities in a non-dual holism, the Judeo-Christian dieties represent a duality that shows syncretist influence from other religions such as Zoroasterianism and paganism.
Western philosophy and religion emphasize logic with a rigid "either-or" paradigm.
Eastern philosophy emphasizes a free-flowing non-dual holistic approach that embraces even Western concepts.
Overall though, I don't feel comfortable with the logical/rational Western aspect of religion with the either-or paradigm.
The non-dual holistic approach of the Eastern philosophies appeal to me, because it supports a broader worldview, especially the Hindu concept of infinite consciousness.
Suggested reading:
Tibetan Book of the Dead by Fremantle and Chogyam Trungpa
Labels:
consciousness,
deities,
loving-kindness,
state of mind
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)