Does the Recent Teen Suicide Needs to Be Assessed as Child Pornography Case?

RIP Amanda Todd.

This isn't a time to be raging. This is the time to actually tell the truth.

With regard to this case, one might say that some men are wolves and others are cowards, but I believe that the worst of them are the stalkers.

A young man is like a wolf when he grooms his victim online to show her breasts to him, as he records everything and even extracts pictures from the video he makes. This is also known as manufacturing child pornography.

If he passes these pictures to share on a website, he is distributing child pornography when the girl in the material is under 18.

If he or another young man takes this pornography and distributes it to not one but three schools, then this is also called distributing pornography.

This will lead to the girl's friend beating her down because her BF pressured her to have sex with him, possibly because of said pornography.

Both her best friend and the BF also may have received that child pornography.

However, his most heinous crime was to stalk the girl online as she went from school to school, distributing the child pornography to the student body and school staff, just because she wouldn't be coerced into helping him manufacture child pornography using her breasts.

This is morally wrong.

Why? Because he manipulated everyone including the girl, the student body of three schools, and most likely the girl's best friend and her BF.

All three schools need to revise what to do when it becomes known that someone sent child pornography in their email.

However, if the purported stalker turns himself in to the police, then what I wrote a day ago is merely rhetoric.