If a Murder-Suicide Serial Killing is Domestic Terrorism, Then So is Child Abuse (Satire)

It's ironic that President Obama used the term "domestic terrorist" to describe the murder-suicide serial killer that killed women his age because he was a virgin. Yet he has never called a single pedophile a "terrorist" but may have used other code words like "monster".

IDK if a pedophile terrorizes children for years, that's a form of terrorism that is worse than what the deceased Rodger did to seven female victims. The harm is partially perpetrated by society when justice takes its time to gather evidence rather than acting to prevent it.

I know of children so scarred for life that they need strong medication to remain sedated and relatively harmless to self and others.

However, pedophilia is not always restricted to religionists but also occurs when a person with power and control over children puts his need to control others supposedly in his protection at risk. Thus, child soldiers may be considered possible victims of pedophiles. The child wives in primitive communities might also be victims.

Thankfully not everyone is on a power trip and clear heads do detect and give evidence against pedophiles.

Nobody has the right to abuse in any shape or form children. This includes cybersex. It is not loving to expose children to adult-orient chatter.

Be wary.

Report inappropriate content online but ask for GooglePlus to monitor them before shutting them down to complete a list of associates who prey on children.

As well, enable logs on Hangouts and archive evidence for GooglePlus when a pedophile appears. The evidence will support your case not the perpetrator.

Even pedophilia must be considered a terrorist act too, if the Rodgers serial killings are considered by the President of the US to be a form of domestic terrorism.

If spying on private citizens is a form of State terrorism, then abusing children is an act of terrorism against the safety and security of children.

Apart from that, I urge caution since one person's obscenity is another person's erotica. Applying an arbitrary rule that criminalizes erotica puts consumers of erotica in conflict with on-line anti-obscenity "mobs" and does violate freedom of speech.

This is why the NSFW adult communities have it right when they maintain an invitation only policy towards prospective members and a zero-tolerance towards images depicting children. It cannot be assumed that everyone is 18 and over. Instead, everything should be monitored and reported.

Let us rid the Internet of the domestic terrorists who terrorize children, be they pedophiles, child abusers and their ilk, through legal means, even if it leads to more close monitoring by authorities including the CIA, the FBI, the NSA and your local police.

Only through secure monitoring are we truly free.

---

Reference:

2014 Isla Vista Killings: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Isla_Vista_killings

Why Didn't Anyone get Busted for Receiving Child Porn?

Why didn't anyone get busted for receiving child porn from Amanda Todd's stalker?

Why didn't they report the pictures to the police instead of allowing the bullying to happen?

I'll tell you why: because Amanda Todd was biracial and not white. Being outside the In group meant that she was prey to all the boys who she was sexually active with, who most likely had a copy of her boob pics from the pedo-bear who groomed her.

She was also the subject of scorn by all the girls in her school who received her pictures, even though they too should have reported the pictures to the police, too.

Instead, they judged her without even knowing they were participating in the pedo-bear's sexual harassment of Amanda Todd.

This is why I feel that the safety and security of children online needs to be discussed in middle school, not high school when it's too late.

As well, every one who knew of Amanda Todd and received those pictures, but got the wrong impression of her, everyone of them aided and abetted in the crime of sexual harassment, especially the boys who were sexually active with her.

In short, it is statutory rape to have sex with a minor, even when you are minor too, because none of the boys admitted he had those pictures to her before consent.

IMO she committed suicide because because they only wanted sex with her because they had her pictures.

Does the Recent Teen Suicide Needs to Be Assessed as Child Pornography Case?

RIP Amanda Todd.

This isn't a time to be raging. This is the time to actually tell the truth.

With regard to this case, one might say that some men are wolves and others are cowards, but I believe that the worst of them are the stalkers.

A young man is like a wolf when he grooms his victim online to show her breasts to him, as he records everything and even extracts pictures from the video he makes. This is also known as manufacturing child pornography.

If he passes these pictures to share on a website, he is distributing child pornography when the girl in the material is under 18.

If he or another young man takes this pornography and distributes it to not one but three schools, then this is also called distributing pornography.

This will lead to the girl's friend beating her down because her BF pressured her to have sex with him, possibly because of said pornography.

Both her best friend and the BF also may have received that child pornography.

However, his most heinous crime was to stalk the girl online as she went from school to school, distributing the child pornography to the student body and school staff, just because she wouldn't be coerced into helping him manufacture child pornography using her breasts.

This is morally wrong.

Why? Because he manipulated everyone including the girl, the student body of three schools, and most likely the girl's best friend and her BF.

All three schools need to revise what to do when it becomes known that someone sent child pornography in their email.

However, if the purported stalker turns himself in to the police, then what I wrote a day ago is merely rhetoric.