Propaganda and The So-Called War on Terrorists (satire)

IMO the biggest fallacy on the Internet is this: "All Muslims are terrorists." This is the fallacy that the Mainstream Media (MSM) put out daily in their broadcasts. Yet they fell over themselves trying to paint the Chapel Hill terrorist as an angry man who hated Christians and Muslims equally.

Yes, you heard me correctly: I am labelling the far-left atheist turned anarchist a terrorist. Why? To show that the label "terrorist" is as ridiculous for an atheist as it is for all terrorists who hide behind religion.

This explains why the MSM use the neutral term "extremist" rather than applying a religious label since such extremists hide behind religion.

Even when the false flag terms "Muslim terrorist" and "Islamic jihadi" are bandied about, it is used by MSM as propaganda to distract from the fact that these conflicts in the Middle East, and in the Ukraine are about oil and supported by Big Oil.

So far, when exposed to this truth, the people who buy into this propaganda will go to any lengths to denigrate naysayers while paint the term "Muslim terrorists" as an unrealistic fact, despite it not being anywhere near the truth, except in their minds.

To put it bliuntlu: Big Oil wants Syria's oil. It also wants Libya's oil, and Iraq's oil. It wants a pipeline to traverse Afghanistan from oil fields in Kazakstan to Pakistan, and it wants Russia's oil to keep flowing through pipelines through the Ukraine into the EU.

Most likely, Boko Haram is a distraction from the fact that Mr Jonathan is unwilling share the wealth with all Nigerians, which is a factor in extremists who arose from marginalized Muslims in northeastern Nigeria.

This is the truth that the true believers of "Muslim terrorists" do not want the world to hear. They would rather perpetuate the propaganda that this war is about religion while ignoring the strings being pulled by Big Oil.

Thanks to Big Oil for pulling the wool over their eyes. All the naysayers will just pretend what I just wrote is a conspiracy theory and fall for the MSM lies about "Muslim terrorists."

For not all Muslims are terrorists. Indeed, these extremists hide behind Islam.

Sadly, the fact that few people in the West bother to educate themselves about Arabs and Islam is obvious in how they focus on the Quran and perpetuate hate on Muslims.

Aisha being 9 when she married Mohammad? A fiction concocted to justify child marriage, which is a tradition preceding Islam.

The growing militancy depicted in the Quran? A fiction concocted by taking the Surahs out of context and scrutinizing it from a biased point of view.

It is not the Quran that is the problem with Islam. Rather, it is the fact that the hadiths seem to be misused in a way that reflects the patriarchal tradition preceding Islam. Even shariah has been misused by the extremists, contrary to the ethics contained in the Quran.

I will call the antipathy towards Islam fiction when it is based solely on anti-Muslim propaganda designed to foment hatred towards Muslims. There has not been an unbiased reflection on Islam by certain elements of MSM, but rather a biased slant that paint it as militant.

Such is propaganda, for it creates the fallacy that the object of hatred is worth hating, and thus distracts us from the authors of that propaganda: the elites who stand to profit from their investments in Big Oil.

We in the West are dupes if we believe that Muslims are our enemies. The true enemy will always be the elites who do not care if we fight amongst ourselves, as long as they maintain their investments.

This is why I have stated previously that bombing the oil wells and the pipelines will stop the conflicts in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Nigeria and even the Ukraine.

For the conflict is not the West versus "Muslim terrorists." Rather it is the haves versus the have-nots. They even profit were the far-left to fight with the far-right over Israel, through their investments in weapons of war.

This is why certain elements in the West will not confront the fact that the elites are controlling the people through the State by pushing the propaganda about "Muslim terrorists" since it is safer to believe in a lie than to face the truth.

Yet they will insist these lies about Muslims are the truth, because it fits their limited world view.

Thankfully, they represent a small but vocal minority.

Most people loathe the fact that the elites are controlling our view about wars in the Ukraine, in the Middle East and in Africa. Yet the protests against the propaganda are filtered out of the MSM's stream.

IMO the TV political pundits will discount anti-war demonstrators because serious discussion about the propaganda might lose profits for their masters, the 1% that controls most of the world's wealth.

This is why the call to explain the War on Terror as a "religious war" was given. It is a ruse to divide the people so that the State can control them. As long as the right-wing conservatives are fighting with the left-wing libertarians, the rich can profit from the confusion.

In the end, the West will continue the drama as report by the MSM in support of their masters. We all want the Islamic State wiped out. Yet this drama is orchestrated by the elites for their profit, including the training of the extremists by Israel, Turkey and other players in this sick drama called war.

As for myself, my role is to watch it all and remind the people that Big Oil and their elite masters wants this drama in the name of free market capitalism.

While the rich profit, the middle class is made all the poorer as they fight among themselves, encouraged by cleverly placed propaganda by the State, all thanks to the MSM.

This so-called war on terrorism is inspired by carefully placed propaganda. And the only people laughing on the way to the banks are the rich.

---

Update: March 12, 2015 @ 1330

According to propaganda from Raqqa in eastern Syria, Assyrian Christians' lives have been lost to the Islamic State extremists.

From the extremist's point of view, Islamic State in Iraq and Syria bases their ideology on radical Islam, and their foot soldiers are intent on ushering the End of Days.

That's right: these Muslim religious fanatics are not only deadly, they believe themselves to be the chosen ones of God Almighty, ready to fight with the armies of the Anti-Messiah (the West led by America).

What irony! All of Christendom believes they too are fighting the armies of the Antichrist (jihadi extremists).

In truth, this is merely a distraction from the fact that both the 'anti-Isis' coalition and the ISIS have their eyes on the oil wells, both in eastern Syria and in northern Iraq.

Meanwhile, the Russian government is in full support of an anti-ISIS coalition that is authorized by the UN Security Council and is in accordance with international law.

For the proxy war in Syria and in Iraq is based on Big Oil interests lobbying for control of the lucrative oil market in the Western nations, both of the US-led anti-ISIS coalition and of the proposed UN-approved coalition that Russia wants.

Coincidentally, the 25 cents per litre drop in the price of petrol in the latter part of 2014 was followed by the rise to the same prices before the drop occurred. A lot of oil investors profited from the resulting rise in oil prices, and speculation points to a lot of oil shares being turn into cash to fund the US government's anti-ISIS coalition.

Somewhere in America, Big Oil investors are still laughing on the way to the bank.

---

Originally posted: Feb 23, 2015 @ 11:08 PM PST
Reference:

What ISIS Really Wants ؟ · Raqqa is Being Slaughtered Silently: http://www.raqqa-sl.com/en/?p=658

The ‘anti-ISIS’ Coalition of Deception. The Deceptive Nature of the War against the Islamic State: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-anti-isis-coalition-of-deception-the-deceptive-nature-of-the-war-against-the-islamic-state/5431526

The Upper Class Commits 13 Times the Crime As the Poor

The upper class commits far more crime than the lower class. Street criminals stole $15.3 billion in 1993, but white collar-criminals embezzled $200 billion. Street criminals murdered 23,271 people that year, but the decisions of profit-driven corporations murdered at least 318,368 (through pollution, consumer and worker safety violations, etc.) Corporations deserve blame for these deaths because they lobby for and enact policies which drive up these death rates. Virtually all other rich countries have higher safeguards and lower death rates.

Back in 1993, corporations killed over 300,000 people in America a year, and probably 29,000 Canadians. Today, the annual death rate in Canada in 2002 is around 290,000 while in the US it is about 2,400,000.

I'm not sure how to reduce this death rate. However, the solution would not be found by enacting more laws or even by targeting white-collar crime.

As the recent HSBC scandal regarding money laundering in Mexico has shown, employment recruitment may not have had the required security checks needed to reduce corruption within the banking industry.

Indeed, there needs to be more accountability in white collar jobs along with greater transparency, despite resistance to the idea of a corporation being accountable and transparent in its management.

Why the Poor Get Poorer: The Rich Got a Tax Break Stemming Back over 30 years

The reason why the poor get poorer is because the corporations and businesses owned by the the rich pay less taxes than they did 30 years ago.

Most of our current financial problems in Canada are attributed to NAFTA.

Signed in 1994 NAFTA was a response to the US recessions in the 1980s and 1990s, and was designed to eliminate trade barriers between the US's closest trade partners, Canada and Mexico.

The simple economic rule is:

Less taxes == less money to service the poor

Low taxes give the rich less of a tax burden, whilst placing an increasing burden on the rich. In response to tax breaks, corporations tend to hoard cash.

As well, the rich benefit from corporate welfare, which is more costly to taxpayers than public welfare because of the recent bailout of auto corporations and the Canadian government's propping up Canadian banks,

If the rich's Canadian tax burden was increased by 1 percent, then a few of the problems BC is undergoing would be reduced.

It would also revitalize the economy, resulting in more jobs with better wages.

Perhaps it's time for Canada's rich to pay their fare share.

For them to call a 1% tax increase unfair is laughable, as the corporate tax rate now is unfair to Canadian tax payers.

Today's Corporate Bailouts are a form of welfare fraud!

With the recent announcement that eBay will close its Vancouver office at the end of September 2009, what this actually means is the owner of the company realizes a lot of his investments went tits up during the mortgage fallout back in October 2008.

So he can't afford his lifestyle now, so he assumed western Canada does not need a call centre & that Salt Lake City is a better place for one.

Even so, that CEO didn't lower his income to a sane level... Noooo! Instead, he assumed employee wages are an expense he's better off without, just so he can afford his luxuries!!!

People think Amway is an MLM scam, but global corporate monoliths are the most humoungus of scams, mainly cos if the economy flounders, they can beg for welfare from the State.

Truth is, compared to people living on welfare, corporations get the biggest share of welfare in the form of bailouts from the State using our tax dollars.

Even the biggest welfare fraud artists gets chicken feed compared to the automakers and those banks!!!

SO THE BIGGEST WELFARE FRAUD IS DONE BY CORPORATIONS, AND THE ONGOING CORPORATE BAILOUTS MAKE THOSE CORPORATE ELITES HYPOCRITES WHEN THEY COMPLAIN ABOUT LITTLE FISH DEFRAUDING THE WELFARE OFFICE AGAIN!

BOTH THE BANKS AND THE AUTOMAKERS ARE DEFRAUDING THE TAXPAYERS, BECAUSE THIS RECESSION WAS MANUFACTURER BY BAD DECISIONS THEY MADE, AND WE HAVE TO FOOT THEIR BILL IN EXCHANGE FOR BANK FEES AND CARS WHICH ONLY PROMOTE GLOBAL WARMING.

Therefore, the rich should STFU about the handful of the poor and the homeless supposedly defrauding the government when white collar crime and corporate bailouts are an even bigger form of welfare fraud!

AND CORPORATE ELITES ELECTING TO DO SO - THIS INCLUDES CLOSING EBAY VANCOUVER - ARE THE BIGGEST WELFARE BUMS OF ALL!

FRAK THE RICH!

Classlessness is Socialism's Threat Arising from and Causing the Rich's Continued Oppression of the Underclass

When the middle class ignore their underclass, then they are merely co-opting with the rich.

When they defend the underclass, the rich will see to it that the ringleader is condemned.

Our country is only democratic when it sees the underclass as equal as the middle class, and teaches the rich to do so.

If anything the rich precipitate the class struggle daily. They do so by controlling what we see on the news, on TV, and at the movies. Also, they control what we hear on the radio and MTV.

Finally, they have even made a person a commodity, rather than a human being.

Since the rich have control of the factories, the publishing firms and even the multimedia industry to manufacture the tools of oppression, a person's life can be threatened, be it by arms, propaganda or the spectacle.

Yet the underclass must even remember that it alone is the master of its own existence, not the thug who holds her at gunpoint or the innuendo of politics or even art depicting life on the theatre.

True freedom from such oppression cannot be gained by licentiousness, for our liberation and eventual classlessness is only possible through limitations on freedom called laws.

Instead, such freedom can only be found through the early establishment of one's spiritual path, not through the joining of a religious organization but through interfaith education.

For such freedom is necessary to realize that interdependence will help to establish classlessness in a society still enslaved and ruled by the rich.

One need only look to such countries as Danmark and Sweden as two models of excellence in establishing the social welfare state necessary to bringing fruit to classlessness.

CIA + Big Business = The Overclass

The wealthy have always used many methods to accumulate wealth, but it was not until the mid-1970s that these methods coalesced into a superbly organized, cohesive and efficient machine. After 1975, it became greater than the sum of its parts, a smooth flowing organization of advocacy groups, lobbyists, think tanks, conservative foundations, and PR firms that hurtled the richest 1 percent into the stratosphere.

The origins of this machine, interestingly enough, can be traced back to the CIA. This is not to say the machine is a formal CIA operation, complete with code name and signed documents. (Although such evidence may yet surface — and previously unthinkable domestic operations such as MK-ULTRA, CHAOS and MOCKINGBIRD show this to be a distinct possibility.) But what we do know already indicts the CIA strongly enough. Its principle creators were Irving Kristol, Paul Weyrich, William Simon, Richard Mellon Scaife, Frank Shakespeare, William F. Buckley, Jr., the Rockefeller family, and more. Almost all the machine's creators had CIA backgrounds.

During the 1970s, these men would take the propaganda and operational techniques they had learned in the Cold War and apply them to the Class War. Therefore it is no surprise that the American version of the machine bears an uncanny resemblance to the foreign versions designed to fight communism. The CIA's expert and comprehensive organization of the business class would succeed beyond their wildest dreams. In 1975, the richest 1 percent owned 22 percent of America’s wealth. By 1992, they would nearly double that, to 42 percent — the highest level of inequality in the 20th century. — The Origins of the Overclass

Hence the worsening problems in Bangladesh, Thailand, Nepal, the Philippines, and the Middle East.

This is in addition to the "War on Terrorism" backlash in the wake of 9-11 with NATO troops in Afghanistan and in Iraq, which erupted with civil war in 2004 after the US- and UK-led invasion of 2003.

As well, the Occupy Wall Street movement and other movements which sprang up all over the world are a response to the super-rich and its control of corporations and governments.

Though we are loathe to believe the super-rich are controlling the masses, the truth is the masses are exposed to advertising and other forms of corporate marketing. News media today (newspapers, radio and TV in addition to the Internet) broadcast advertisements to sell product to consumers.

The masses == consumers

As long as the masses buy product, the super-rich make money, whether as business owners, CEOs, and/or owners of stock market shares.

As of October 2011, America's top 1% own 40% of the wealth. Compared to the quote above, the prediction about them owning 42% in 1992 was optimistic.

It turns out that the best ally for the super-rich and the corporations they own stocks in is the CIA, which supported Big Business interests.

However, this is hardly news. Consumer society is more interested in product, and the politics that are hard to sell involve war.

This is why the latest scandal involving the CIA is about a retired General and a military intelligence officer who wrote fan fictions about her hero.

For sex sells.

---

Updated: 20121114 2030