This article is not an anti-religion rant; it is an anti-war message. For my purpose for hurting the feelings of religionists, especially the post-Christians, is to spill my figurative guts about the forever war started by Christendom against the Muslims with the First Crusades.
All the Western powers that be are doing are perpetuating this war, rather than peace because they are forcing Western democracy on the Muslim nations and the Jihadis are also complicit in all of this too.
When the West admits that the War on Terrorism is a religious war against secularist globalism by the jihadis such as ISIS, that will mark their willingness to confront the truth.
Indeed, the Catholic Church has to make amends to the Muslim nations, and put their support behind the West and their UN and NATO forces.
As seen through jihadi eyes, the UN and NATO peace-keeping forces are viewed as a secular Crusade that threatens the integrity of world's only believers of God Almighty, ISIS and their al Qaeda and Taliban allies.
I condemn the Catholic Church for the trouble in the Middle East since the First Crusades, which was a mad grab for land, fame and power as well as removing unwanted lesser nobility so that the regal elite of Europe could vie for the honor of being offered kingdoms for forcibly converting the Teutonic, Gothic, and savage barbarians such as the Huns and Mongols.
As well, the Church failed to stop its petty wars in the Holy Land where it implemented proxy wars which still play out today. Indeed, the Crusades is the reason of why the Muslims are divided between jihadis and its Salafi origins within Saudi Arabia and the rest of Islam, both Shi'ite and Sunni.
Why do you think Christians are being persecuted today? Because of the delusion called "a healthy ego" and the rise of narcissism that gives rise to the arrogance of individualism. Even the public education system in the West promotes the ideals that is seen by the jihadis as "decadent hedonism" e.g. abandoning overdressed tradition for nearly-naked modernism.
Back over a thousand years ago, the First Crusade was when the current war against jihadis began &madash; back when the Saracens were growing more civilized in their conquered lands, two hundred years after Mohammed's death circa mid -7th century and continuing until the modern era.
It is indeed the epitome of a forever war; not in 1947, though.
For the rise of the state of Israel is actually a continuation of the rivalry between the French and the English, which was started when the Normans conquered England so long ago that only legends of that time remain.
Thus the proxy war that Bashir Al-Assad of Syria mentioned in an interview recently originally began with the Frankish and the English nobles founding a handful of kingdoms in the Holy Land.
Today, both France and England continue their rivalry in the Middle East to this day through their dealings with the US, Russia and China.
As well, the jihadism, the Salafism and the Islamism are also not new: they began right after Mohammed's death and continue on to this day.
It is time for the Church to continue to make amends with the Muslim nations, and to admit its part in this abuse of power starting with Charlemagne circa 768 CE.
For it is the backing of the State by Religion that is truly an evil: for example, the current case of the Orthodox Church in Russia. In their arrogance, the Russian Orthodox Church shows signs of corruption. Putin's pogrom against homosexuality is no different from the anti-gay rhetoric from the pulpits of Christendom in the Byzantine Empire. By scapegoating the LGBT community, the world's religions are distracting us from the fact that nobody really cares if a person is gay except to exercise control over their private affairs.
Likewise, the Muslim nations exercise control over the lives of its community with a big obsession with cleanliness, as though washing the hands and feet is enough to truly be clean.
No religion's hands are truly clean when it comes to war if they cannot turn their swords into ploughshares.
Originally posted August 31, 2014 at 4:52 PM PDT
References:
Background for First Crusade: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Crusade
Background for Charlemagne: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlemagne
Background for Jihadism, Islamism, Salafism, and Wahhabism:
Jihadism started circa early 19th century in the Fula Jihads: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fula_jihads
Islamism begin in early 18th century: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamism
Salafism developed in the latter part of the 10th century: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafi_movement
Wahhabism arose in the 18th Century:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_ibn_Abd_al-Wahhab
Showing posts with label jihadi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jihadi. Show all posts
20150608
It's a Holy War to the Jihadis! (satire)
In order to fully comprehend what is happening in Iraq, Syria and other parts of the Middle East, let us begin with the Crusades.
How do we explain the Crusades to post-modern society?
That is when Europeans were asked by the Byzantine Empire to defend Christendom from Arabic Muslims, who were "liberating" the Middle East from oppression of Christian "heretics" by the religious orthodoxy and their state collaborators.
This moment in history is and was a clash between religions: Islam versus Christianity.
Yet the actual result of the First Crusades was the establishment of Christian kingdoms run by minor European nobles who lusted for the glory of an imperial dynasty.
Both sides of this conflict in the Middle East did so for the noble cause called "the Glory of God." For sometimes religion is used to distract us from the fact that both sides were in it for fame and fortune.
Please keep that in mind when you hear about the Islamic State being bombed by the US.
It is a religious war for the jihadis. It is not just a terrorist crisis. Rather, it is a moral crisis, a war between decadent secularism and holy Islamism. The irony is, the jihadis may be viewed as a corrupt people operating outside of mainstream Islam.
These jihadis are not really "good' Muslims, but fervent religious fanatics who may be worse than Westboro Baptists hating gays.
It's a holy war for these Jihadis.
In a way, it is no different from the religious right have been co-opted by the GOP in America, the Christian democrats running Germany, and even Vladimir Putin's ties to the Russian Orthodox Church with his ban on homosexuality in Russia.
Ah, those silly end-of-days fanatics need to rein in ushering in the end of the world!
Originally posted August 20, 2014 at 4:30 PM PDT
How do we explain the Crusades to post-modern society?
That is when Europeans were asked by the Byzantine Empire to defend Christendom from Arabic Muslims, who were "liberating" the Middle East from oppression of Christian "heretics" by the religious orthodoxy and their state collaborators.
This moment in history is and was a clash between religions: Islam versus Christianity.
Yet the actual result of the First Crusades was the establishment of Christian kingdoms run by minor European nobles who lusted for the glory of an imperial dynasty.
Both sides of this conflict in the Middle East did so for the noble cause called "the Glory of God." For sometimes religion is used to distract us from the fact that both sides were in it for fame and fortune.
Please keep that in mind when you hear about the Islamic State being bombed by the US.
It is a religious war for the jihadis. It is not just a terrorist crisis. Rather, it is a moral crisis, a war between decadent secularism and holy Islamism. The irony is, the jihadis may be viewed as a corrupt people operating outside of mainstream Islam.
These jihadis are not really "good' Muslims, but fervent religious fanatics who may be worse than Westboro Baptists hating gays.
It's a holy war for these Jihadis.
In a way, it is no different from the religious right have been co-opted by the GOP in America, the Christian democrats running Germany, and even Vladimir Putin's ties to the Russian Orthodox Church with his ban on homosexuality in Russia.
Ah, those silly end-of-days fanatics need to rein in ushering in the end of the world!
Originally posted August 20, 2014 at 4:30 PM PDT
20141108
Dear Feminists (satire)
To me horror is viewed as a tragic comedy. This is because a movie isn't as scary as reality is.
Unless it is happening in the Middle East, I might not care about a horror movie since what's happening there is purely horrific. Sometimes children and women are oppressed there by their fathers, brothers and male cousins daily.
For it is a man's world there, still.
That's why certain feminists need to moderate their unbridled criticism about US military in the Middle East and especially about the West in Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan.
Feminists, your job is to facilitate change through dialogue, rather than just criticize the American government's gunboat democracy in the Middle East.
Look what happened to America when it forced Japan to open up trade in 1853: it led to the Japanese military bombing Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. Why? Because a bunch of elites wanted to amass a fortune, whilst letting the Japanese military turn Japan into a militant society in the 1930s.
Today we need feminists to bring change to how we deal with the Middle East.
Even if it means 16 FA-18 jets and 300 Canadian personnel in Kuwait. This was a done deal in Ottawa, thanks to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and was made without consultation with the federal Liberal, NDP and Green Parties" elected representatives, most of whom still went along with the deal.
Even if it means crazy young males might turn into jihadi cult members overnight and cause trouble. In two recent cases, the so-called jidhadis were actually mentally ill men whose actions may look like homegrown terrorism.
It is by dialogue that war is prevented.
While horror movies amuse me, the Islamic State horrifies me enough to accept the increased military presence of America and Canada in northern Iraq.
However I am thankful that most feminists are involved in the growing dialog on the War on Terror. I hope their voices can be heard over the increasing call for military presence in the Middle East.
Unless it is happening in the Middle East, I might not care about a horror movie since what's happening there is purely horrific. Sometimes children and women are oppressed there by their fathers, brothers and male cousins daily.
For it is a man's world there, still.
That's why certain feminists need to moderate their unbridled criticism about US military in the Middle East and especially about the West in Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan.
Feminists, your job is to facilitate change through dialogue, rather than just criticize the American government's gunboat democracy in the Middle East.
Look what happened to America when it forced Japan to open up trade in 1853: it led to the Japanese military bombing Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. Why? Because a bunch of elites wanted to amass a fortune, whilst letting the Japanese military turn Japan into a militant society in the 1930s.
Today we need feminists to bring change to how we deal with the Middle East.
Even if it means 16 FA-18 jets and 300 Canadian personnel in Kuwait. This was a done deal in Ottawa, thanks to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and was made without consultation with the federal Liberal, NDP and Green Parties" elected representatives, most of whom still went along with the deal.
Even if it means crazy young males might turn into jihadi cult members overnight and cause trouble. In two recent cases, the so-called jidhadis were actually mentally ill men whose actions may look like homegrown terrorism.
It is by dialogue that war is prevented.
While horror movies amuse me, the Islamic State horrifies me enough to accept the increased military presence of America and Canada in northern Iraq.
However I am thankful that most feminists are involved in the growing dialog on the War on Terror. I hope their voices can be heard over the increasing call for military presence in the Middle East.
posted from Bloggeroid
Reference:
Criticism of the War on Terror: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_War_on_Terror
20141104
Make War no More (satire)
Regarding the Middle East, the utter madness of warfare is that the jihadi cult that is the West's enemy (Islamic State) is clandestinely trained by certain Western states (mainly the US, back before Saddam was portrayed in a negative light by the New York Times since 1996).
These jihadi cult members are clandestinely paid by the Qatar / Kuwait / Saudi hegemony in the Middle East and indirectly by US-led interests in the West, especially the Five Eyes through oil money.
Regarding the warfare in the Middle East, the purpose of staged conflicts in this region is to coerce the populace into total submission to the Islamic jihadi cult, which is Muslim in name only.
Yet the scare tactics of the West are no match for Muslim solidarity which too is a tool of coercion. However, most Muslims know the jihadi cult is sham Islam.
In America, the best analog in Christianity is Army of God which is a bigger threat to the US than the Islamic State, the major jihadi cult in eastern Syria and northern Iraq.
However, the two killings near Ottawa were not committed by homegrown terrorists but by mentally ill men who were attracted to the jihadi cult.
IMO the term jihadi cult is a more accurate term than Islamic militant since their violence is anathema to Islam as organized religion.
Indeed, the jihadi cult leaders of the Islamic State, al Qaeda, and Taliban and affiliates consider all organized religion and even secular government the cult of unbelievers because of the perceived willingness to compromise during nationalization.
When a cult believes itself so righteous in its highly esteemed belief in God Almighty, it breaks its covenant with Him.
These are no true saints of Islam, and their martyrdom only serves their devilish notion of worship through warfare.
By their actions, each side errs. It is sad that Judaism and Islam is misused like this, while Christianity too is tainted.
More than ever, it is time for all Muslims, Jews and Christians who believe love is the root of peace to decry the war by proxy being played in the Middle East.
posted from Bloggeroid
20141030
JIhadi or Not Jihadi (satire)
Even though the Westernized converts to the Jihadi cult are homegrown and often mentally ill and former drug addicts, it makes you wonder exactly why the rest of the jihadis in the Islamic State are assumed to be sane.
IMO if you attack people in a Western country, you are assumed to be crazy unless fit to stand trial. What that means is you comply to the demands of the State (the Majesty's court in the Commonwealth) or its equivalent elsewhere except the Middle East.
In short, the mentally ill label is misused in the case of Westernized jihadi to mean the same as cult member. Hence, the IS warriors are just as crazy as the guys who kill Canadian soldiers.
It matters not what the guy's mother said. Labels are used to separate the sane from the insane.
Thus the mass media is resorting to a form of prejudiced profiling by labeling homegrown terrorists crazy and drug addicts.
There is even denial that they are terrorists. We can explain the Ottawa shooter as a disgruntled guy who was mad he didn't get his passport.
Then the mass media can sell "crazy guy shoots up Ottawa over passport" instead of calling a jihadi a jihadi.
IMO they are jihadi because they targeted Canadian soldiers but not pedestrians in a mall. However, it makes good copy to create doubt in the news consumers' minds.
I have no such doubt: two jihadi, homegrown, one dead and the other in jail.
It is likely the State will collaborate with the man who ran over two soldier, and it will be called an act of terrorism. Since then, all soldiers are ordered in Canada to dress like a plain-clothes ninja to blend in with the rest of Canadians.
It's about time. Out of uniform is the best disguise. Now the army can route out terrorism wherever it may start, or even instigate a riot to flush out the homegrown jihadi.
UPDATE: The late M. Zehaf-Bbibeau is not a terrorist, but a former homeless drug addict who was ignored by Ottawa and the system. Most likely he was off his medication and blamed the Canadian government for ignoring his pleas for help three years ago.
Although the shooting last week in Ottawa left two people dead, this is the Conservative government's fault for their inability to treat the homeless addicts across Canada with respect and dignity that Harper et al pays daily to people who can afford rehab.
This tragedy is preventable when compassion enables the rare politician to actually listen to them with their heart.
Karma is a bitch, ain't it, Ottawa?
Reference:
http://globalnews.ca/news/1639555/why-didnt-ottawa-gunman-zehaf-bibeau-get-treatment-3-years-ago/
IMO if you attack people in a Western country, you are assumed to be crazy unless fit to stand trial. What that means is you comply to the demands of the State (the Majesty's court in the Commonwealth) or its equivalent elsewhere except the Middle East.
In short, the mentally ill label is misused in the case of Westernized jihadi to mean the same as cult member. Hence, the IS warriors are just as crazy as the guys who kill Canadian soldiers.
It matters not what the guy's mother said. Labels are used to separate the sane from the insane.
Thus the mass media is resorting to a form of prejudiced profiling by labeling homegrown terrorists crazy and drug addicts.
There is even denial that they are terrorists. We can explain the Ottawa shooter as a disgruntled guy who was mad he didn't get his passport.
Then the mass media can sell "crazy guy shoots up Ottawa over passport" instead of calling a jihadi a jihadi.
IMO they are jihadi because they targeted Canadian soldiers but not pedestrians in a mall. However, it makes good copy to create doubt in the news consumers' minds.
I have no such doubt: two jihadi, homegrown, one dead and the other in jail.
It is likely the State will collaborate with the man who ran over two soldier, and it will be called an act of terrorism. Since then, all soldiers are ordered in Canada to dress like a plain-clothes ninja to blend in with the rest of Canadians.
It's about time. Out of uniform is the best disguise. Now the army can route out terrorism wherever it may start, or even instigate a riot to flush out the homegrown jihadi.
UPDATE: The late M. Zehaf-Bbibeau is not a terrorist, but a former homeless drug addict who was ignored by Ottawa and the system. Most likely he was off his medication and blamed the Canadian government for ignoring his pleas for help three years ago.
Although the shooting last week in Ottawa left two people dead, this is the Conservative government's fault for their inability to treat the homeless addicts across Canada with respect and dignity that Harper et al pays daily to people who can afford rehab.
This tragedy is preventable when compassion enables the rare politician to actually listen to them with their heart.
Karma is a bitch, ain't it, Ottawa?
Reference:
http://globalnews.ca/news/1639555/why-didnt-ottawa-gunman-zehaf-bibeau-get-treatment-3-years-ago/
20141026
The Politics of Homegrown Jihadi (satire)
Radicalized Islam is more political than religious, and thus inspires a cult of homegrown jihadis with nothing to lose except their lives.
God Almighty has no mercy for the evil that men are capable of doing.
This is not Satan's work; the body count suggests that, despite their religious leaning, al Qaeda, Islamic State, Taleban, and other radicalized religious group including Army of God antiabortion radicals only hide behind the holiness of God himself.
For these men and women who radicalize may speak of God but their use of violence shows their materialist political activism to be a clear and present danger to society
As long as the West continues forcing its Crusade of Democracy on the Middle East, so shall we experience more attacks by lone wolf jihadi at home.
Yes, I am suggesting that the US foreign policy of forcing the Middle East to accept democracy is what is causing the Muslims to radicalize against it.
If you think the two reported incidents in recent months of radical Muslims killing Canadian soldiers had nothing to do with the Islamic State, then you are mistaken.
By trying to force democracy on Syria by tacit support of the rebels there, it became obvious that this was all a laughable cover for intrigue against Russia by the US which culminated in the Ukraine crisis.
However, the European Community is rallying around the supposed underdog, the Ukraine — controlled by a far right government — while Russia is only protecting its Russian citizens, many of whom had dual citizenship. The problem started when the new government wanted to enfranchise only Ukrainians.
In response, the far right elements of the Russian-Ukrainians rebelled, but both sides are right-wing. Very few Ukrainians and Russians are left-wing, who they view as criminals who should never hold power, due to the economic devestation that the Soviet government had caused in the Ukraine, including massive starvation.
However, the Ukrainian crisis is also a proxy war with the US government propagandizing to the Europeans and Russia aiming to protect its citizens.
All in all, both the Syrian and the Ukrainian crises are designed to polarize the world's people. The anti-Russian propaganda is almost as bad as the Russian propaganda but the Ukrainian counter-propaganda is just as bad.
As for Syria, its propaganda gets almost everything right but condones the corruption of top Syrian oligarchs. Likewise, Russia's leader Putin also condones the corruption of top Russian oligarchs with their billions being invested in the European Community.
It is only a matter of time before World War 3 flares up, should cool heads not prevail. However, what you see in each area — be it the Islamic State being carved out of northern Iraq this year, the Syrian crisis declares as of October 2011, and the Ukraine-Russia conflict — is merely the US-led West versus Russia with full support from China.
I guess the Cold War still is in its death throes, and the incident on September 11, 2001 was an aftershock with the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts a few tremors. A decade later, Arab Spring majorly affected Libya and Syria.
It is time America stopped caring about the Middle East so much that it thinks forcing democracy on Afghanistan, Iraq and now Syria will lead to peace. The resultant anarchy is a sure sign that democracy at gunpoint is not working.
Returning to the recent two incidents of homegrown terrorism in Canada, that is just karma for Harper sending 16 jets and 300 personnel to Kuwait. Nobody was surprised in Ottawa.
Remember that Kuwait also has a handful of al Qaeda veterans who were released from Gitmo not too long ago. So it is obvious that these former Jihadis are working for Kuwait, and most likely Canada and America are collaborators in a proxy war between the West and the Red axis (China and Russia).
Although it looks good to bomb northern Iraq in the news, the IS may likely be a puppet of the Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi axis, funded by oil money.
Overall, this makes us all complicit in the Middle Eastern problem every time people in the free world drive their SUVs to fill up at the gas pump. That is why I take the bus, because I have already paid for my portion of the gas to run that bus in advance. ;)
NEWS UPDATE: the Ottawa gunman purported by PM Harper and mainstream media to be a possible terrorist are false and defamatory.
M. Zehaf-Bibeau was not a homegrown terrorist — al-Qaeda, Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), and the Taleban have a tendency to lie to support their cause. I am sure Osama bin Laden did it after 9-11, which is evidenced by his first video denying involvement, but later changing his tune when he saw the effect it had on the stock market.
It looks like Zehaf-Bibeau did not get help for his addictions and mental health issues in 2011 as he demanded, simply because the homeless and poor are rejected by most drug rehabilitation centres due to their profit mentality e.g. drug rehab for profit.
At the street level, very few major cities in Canada are willing to cough up public money to put addicts requesting treatment into a treatment program, mainly because most homeless addicts in rehab will walk away because they lost the ability to await positive changes, which can take up to three or more years.
If M. Zehaf-Bibeau had entered a treatment centre for the homeless, there is a good chance that he would have gotten kicked out within a week. Therefore, this article has me bleeding heart a-going.
Therefore Ottawa's shooting scare is because their hands are not clean of how they treat the homeless addicts daily. Indeed, karma is a bitch - too bad three people had to die. May they all rest in peace.
Reference:
20140918
He Who Lives For Jihad Dies For Jihad (satire)
"These are the limits set by God. Whoever obeys God and His Messenger, He will admit him to gardens beneath which rivers flow, remaining there forever. That is a great success.
Whoever disobeys God and His Messenger and crosses the limits set by Him, He shall admit him to the Fire, remaining there forever. For him there is a humiliating punishment." - Surah 4:13-14
Thus the jihadis are losers due to crossing the limits set by God Almighty. They shall not enter Paradise, where there is no fornication.
Instead, he who has killed does not bring glory to God but sins against God.
His destination will be the Outer Darkness to that he alone has made a path.
Indeed, by choosing hatred for unbelievers, the jihadis has sealed his fate. Though he may claim to be for the Muslim community, his actions make him unclean and puts a stain on his reputation.
No one truly does the work of God when he kills in His Name. For jihadis truly are the henchmen of Iblis. In their quest for glory, they have lost the respect of the Muslim community.
What good is shariah when they who sin are condemned to death? What good is a god who is bloodthirsty? Whose God is this that brings adversity to women?
I as a Buddhist hate not the jihadi. Nor do I as a Christian wish a Crusade again terrorism. For "terrorism" is another word for "freedom fighter."
Yet there is no freedom under shariah if you are not a man. This is why the jihadis are unclean. For freedom is the condition of bring free from the negativities of action and behavior, and jihadis by their nature are negative.
Thus they are not of God Almighty but of Iblis. Who wears black but Shaitan's own? What jihadi is for Him when it is a man he serves and is happy to die for?
Any person who believes glory is on the battlefield is lost. For true believers will save other people, regardless of faith. The jihadis will kill unbelievers in the name of God. Thus they show no mercy, for only they are believers.
What vile creatures they are! God Almighty condemns them. They have lost the only battle worth fighting when they chose to kill. No honor comes to he who murders so willingly.
Only in the case of jihadis do I urge the free world to destroy. For inaction will lead to a global terrorist network that will strike at the heart of the Western world, be it Birmingham, Berlin, Chechen, Nigeria, Burma, Malaysia, Tokyo, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston, Miami, New York, Montreal, Ottawa or Vancouver.
Godspeed to the troops of NATO. Remember that this is the New Crusade to the believers. It is holy war, not a war of attrition, for they are fighting for jihad.
Why else would the Pope seek out Muslim leaders?
"He who leads into captivity shall go into captivity; he who kills with the sword shall be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints." - Revelations 13:10
Whoever disobeys God and His Messenger and crosses the limits set by Him, He shall admit him to the Fire, remaining there forever. For him there is a humiliating punishment." - Surah 4:13-14
Thus the jihadis are losers due to crossing the limits set by God Almighty. They shall not enter Paradise, where there is no fornication.
Instead, he who has killed does not bring glory to God but sins against God.
His destination will be the Outer Darkness to that he alone has made a path.
Indeed, by choosing hatred for unbelievers, the jihadis has sealed his fate. Though he may claim to be for the Muslim community, his actions make him unclean and puts a stain on his reputation.
No one truly does the work of God when he kills in His Name. For jihadis truly are the henchmen of Iblis. In their quest for glory, they have lost the respect of the Muslim community.
What good is shariah when they who sin are condemned to death? What good is a god who is bloodthirsty? Whose God is this that brings adversity to women?
I as a Buddhist hate not the jihadi. Nor do I as a Christian wish a Crusade again terrorism. For "terrorism" is another word for "freedom fighter."
Yet there is no freedom under shariah if you are not a man. This is why the jihadis are unclean. For freedom is the condition of bring free from the negativities of action and behavior, and jihadis by their nature are negative.
Thus they are not of God Almighty but of Iblis. Who wears black but Shaitan's own? What jihadi is for Him when it is a man he serves and is happy to die for?
Any person who believes glory is on the battlefield is lost. For true believers will save other people, regardless of faith. The jihadis will kill unbelievers in the name of God. Thus they show no mercy, for only they are believers.
What vile creatures they are! God Almighty condemns them. They have lost the only battle worth fighting when they chose to kill. No honor comes to he who murders so willingly.
Only in the case of jihadis do I urge the free world to destroy. For inaction will lead to a global terrorist network that will strike at the heart of the Western world, be it Birmingham, Berlin, Chechen, Nigeria, Burma, Malaysia, Tokyo, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston, Miami, New York, Montreal, Ottawa or Vancouver.
Godspeed to the troops of NATO. Remember that this is the New Crusade to the believers. It is holy war, not a war of attrition, for they are fighting for jihad.
Why else would the Pope seek out Muslim leaders?
"He who leads into captivity shall go into captivity; he who kills with the sword shall be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints." - Revelations 13:10
20140908
How Home-Grown Islamist Jihadis Would Use GooglePlus as a Forum to Plot Against Their Enemies (satire)
First of all they would use Arabic
Next they would use code words, so as to not arouse suspicion.
They would create a community that other jihadis would request permission to enter. This keeps out spies.
Googleplus Staff would not be able to monitor them unless they have a team that knows and can read Arabic to monitor all communities that use Arabic.
It would be harder to monitor home-grown jihadis using all the languages of the Western would because of the code word phrases used. The only way to flush them out would be to have anti-terrorist team at Googleplus whose job is to be trolls to incite jihadis by being vehemently anti-terrorist.
The anti-terrorists would start by posting the successes of the Iraqi government in beating back the IS jihadis. They would also be vehemently anti-jihadi.
It is the imperative for Googleplus to have anti-jihadis to troll suspected communities to flush out home-grown terrorists who will use fake names to disguise themselves.
Of course, no jihadi would be that stupid to use a real name since most if not all Arabic communities of Googleplus are already monitored.
Or are they?
Next they would use code words, so as to not arouse suspicion.
They would create a community that other jihadis would request permission to enter. This keeps out spies.
Googleplus Staff would not be able to monitor them unless they have a team that knows and can read Arabic to monitor all communities that use Arabic.
It would be harder to monitor home-grown jihadis using all the languages of the Western would because of the code word phrases used. The only way to flush them out would be to have anti-terrorist team at Googleplus whose job is to be trolls to incite jihadis by being vehemently anti-terrorist.
The anti-terrorists would start by posting the successes of the Iraqi government in beating back the IS jihadis. They would also be vehemently anti-jihadi.
It is the imperative for Googleplus to have anti-jihadis to troll suspected communities to flush out home-grown terrorists who will use fake names to disguise themselves.
Of course, no jihadi would be that stupid to use a real name since most if not all Arabic communities of Googleplus are already monitored.
Or are they?
20140118
No one's Hands are Clean in the Middle East (satire)
State terrorism in Israel is the mother of Islamic terrorism. America supports the terrorism Israel perpetrates on Palestinians.
Ergo salafi terrorism is justifiable in the eyes of al Qaeda but not in the eyes of the West.
However Muslim terrorists, IDF and America are guilty of war crimes and facilitate terrorism.
Evidence: America supports Chechen freedom fighters. The US also supports Israel providing arms and financial aid. America does so to avoid being labelled anti-Semitic.
Israel has terrorized Palestinians since before 1948. Sharon is guilty of war crimes. For every Israeli killed by Palestinian militants Israel kills 100+. Therefore the state of Israel has been terrorizing Palestinians for over 65 years. Even the forced removal of Bedouin people is state terrorism.
As well, America condones covert racism. The Indian Wars were ethnic cleansing and genocide. Today the oppression of Hispanic illegal aliens is racist.
The oppression of poor people in North Carolina is class warfare by its elites. Its blacks in the prison population are survivors of endemic racism.
Yet without American aid Israel would be unable to terrorize Muslims living within its borders.
For the only purpose of American support of Israel is to ensure that its Muslim neighbor Iraq remains host to al Qaeda which was once a valuable CIA asset. Now the jihadis are the valuable assets of the gulf states specifically Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
As well, it is most likely that Bahrain's Arab Spring failed due to Saudi aid since the ruling party is run by Saudis.
Ergo Saudi Arabia may also facilitate and possibly support terrorism in the Middle East along with Russia and China.
However, the problem began when Great Britain and French facilitated Zionist terrorism against Palestinian Arabs before Israel's founding in 1949.
No one's hands are clean in the Middle East because it's all about the money.
Posted via Blogaway
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)