This is a FYI addressing followers and/or members of G+ who conclude from off-the-cuff remarks I made about misogyny and sexism. I as the messenger am sometimes accused of being a misogynist and sexist by certain #SJW within the communities both on Google Plus and on social media, e.g. Reddit.
"Hori ez dela nire asmo bat!" ("This is not my intent!") was what the Basque iraultzaileen (revolutionaries) were sometimes hear to shout when the Spanish government accused them of being terrorists rather than freedom fighters that they all were. Today they are politicians after they chose to serve their community rather than to continue to blow up Spaniards.
In response to such ignorance by my fellow revolutionaries who ought to know better, I have only the motto of the Order of the Garter to remind my accusers that this is evil thinking - "Honi soit qui mal y pense".
Though the word "honi" is borrowed from the Basque, the overall meaning in this context is, "just because I mention misogyny and sexism, your accusations of me regarding misogyny and sexism are but blaming the messenger.
For I am not a misogynist nor a sexist; rather, my use of misogyny and sexism help to inspire hyperbole and satire.
If you punch a fascist as Antifa, then you have become the fascist. Your high ideals and higher moral ground is a disgrace to freedom and democracy, and your only claim is to degeneracy and perversions of all kinds.
Until people of color, especially women, are no longer oppressed like those so-called terrorists in Europe, the New Left's cause is lost in parties on the weekend while a few revolutionaries begin a slow descent into the madness of drug abuse and the endless cycle of addiction and rehabilitation.
Yet not all revolutionaries are addicts. For the majority of the New Left are productive and sober members of society.
As for women who follow me and were offended by direct messages prior today, I have only this excuse: "I am old school and the metrosexuality of the average beta male who fronts feminism could lead I as a fool to become a misogynist and sexist by one small error, to listen to the heart when the voice of reason cries "Resist, resist, wafi sabil allah eiz wajil" (Resist, resist, for the sake of God Almighty).
No, I am not a terrorist for speaking Arabic; I am a revolutionary for peace, love, unity and respect.
Fuck ISIL, and death to the death cultists known as Da'esh. My thanks to Russia and America - work together to make politics great again!
For those feminists in the know, I rebuke the youtube male feminist who shot dead his co-streamer, a woman. Social justice ideology condemns murder as more heinous than shutting down free speech, and I condemn Antifa supporters for that.
In closing I will also deny that the presumed to be terror attacks in Europe and the UK are by terrorists. They were , are, and have always been freedom fighters.
In closing, I have this to say:
Après avoir été qualifiés de terroristes,
les combattants de la liberté
ont perdu leur cause de liberté,
et l'Occident - le monde libre -
n'est plus ce qu'il était.
After they were labeled terrorists,
the freedom fighters
have lost their cause of freedom,
and the West - the free world -
is no longer what it was.
As for extremists, they have lost their true reason for existence - to free their peple from oppression from the majority, who are "whiter" than they are, while taking the moral high ground.
This is not a race war, because the race ideology is based on pseudoscience - it is a fact that the West honors the light skinned over the dark skinned people.
This is not racist; this is the once unspoken truth, a manner of apocalypse, my revelation to freedom lovers everywhere.
If you are truly a revolutionary for freedom, you know what greater jihad means. Even if our right-wing detractors mock us, remember this: jihad is the holy war against the worldly, not all of humanity but only those people who have lost their way. So offer them the true way of freedom lovers, charity, loving-kindness or whatever you call it these days.
And remember that I am not an Islamist nor am I what label is used to delegitimize my place in the history of freedom.
Finally, as my German friends might think, I say: "Die einzige gute Party ist der Block Party. Fuck Politik!" (The only good party is the block part! Fuck politics!"
Showing posts with label terrorism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label terrorism. Show all posts
20170518
20160711
Associated Post, Reuters and Voice of America Mainstream Media Propaganda Sources (Satire)
As of Tuesday previous to this date on March 16, 2016, the latest revelation is that both AP, Reuters and Voice of America take bribes from Qatari and Saudi government officials to spread propaganda that is sectarian that contains fallacies about Iran.
Not only that, MainStream Media news-bytes tend to re-frame freedom fighters as terrorists - especially the Muslim radicals who bombed Brussels recently, most of whom are probably Belgian citizens disenfranchised by the European majority that daily oppress them by being bigots and racists.
Maybe a certain pope a long time ago made a big error in not allying with the Mongols of the Golden Horde.
Today, the Belgian security forces and police are doing door to door searches to oust freedom fighters of Muslim origin, fellow citizens that ghettoized themselves due to antipathy toward multi-faith solidarity, in stark contrast to the fact that Belgium is a mix of French, German and Dutch nationalities along with Walloons and other Franconian peoples.
A shame that Belgium excludes non-Europeans from the multicultural existence of the EU, just because they don't speak a European language or follow Eurocentric customs that are based on what is taught in grade school.
Sure, those so called terrorists might have been trained by an Islamist radical fresh from Syria or Iraq. However, the propaganda labels them terrorists because mainstream media wants it that way.
Only sheeple call them terrorists, which makes AP, Reuters and VoA their most trusted source of disinformation. Well, I am not a sheep, so IMHO these Muslims are freedom fighters fighting the subtle tyranny of the European majority, both in Brussels and in Paris.
Anyone who differs with me about this online tends to discount me or pretend I am stupid by engaging in hilarious ad hominems rather than actually understanding that it is not I that is the sheep.
YMMV
Originally published on March 22, 2016 at 6:40 PM.
Reference:
Massive corruption at the UN: Independent Journalist's Accreditation Revoked: https://ingaza.wordpress.com/2016/03/16/investigating-massive-corruption-at-the-un-independent-journalists-accreditation-revoked/
20151126
Paris Attack May Lead to Fascist Takeover of France (satire)
With the news in mainstream media, the Paris attack on November 13, 2015 looks like the French version of 9-11. However, this is only propaganda since mainstream media carefully crafts all reports to jump to conclusions about the perpetrators.
Furthermore, on the day of the attack, French security forces were conducting a test of their security.
No coincidence at all.
However, it sounds more like a repeat of 9-11, complete with smoking guns all around.
Yet we have not seen the cafe that was "blown up." I have seen pictures of people being carried away from the sites of this attack. However, I am still awaiting the gory photos of the bomb blast site to disprove my theory that France created a false flag operation complete with actors playing different roles.
While the attacks on French and Belgian dissents is probably true, the woman killed in France was not a suicide bomber. Rather, she was near the actual suicide bomber. Yet the newspapers once again provided propaganda stating that she blew her self up. As well, a Moroccan woman's former friend sold pictures of her because she looks like the female killed when the bomb went off. However, the mainstream media printed those pictures everytime they mention the deceased female as a suicide bomber.
How ridiculous! A close examination of most of the French dissidents' lives reveal that most of them are not practising Muslims. Indeed, most of them are drug users who are easy prey for terrorists.
As well, it is because of French sentiments that they turn to drugs and petty crimes, only to end up in the midst of a homegrown attack. These sentiments make it difficult for French Muslim children with the bullying in school leading to dropping out of school. It is this bigotry that also leads the Briton dissidents of Britanny to desire to secede from France.
My reason for calling these so-called terrorists dissidents is because they are actually disefnranchised French minorities who are excluded from French society due to the fact that they are not European. Even if one of them rises to become valedectorian of their school, the French elite with conservative ties will let their children keep the minorities in their place.
So much for democracy in France. It is only for the Europeans, not the minorities. This false flag attack is proof of it. For little does the average Parisian know but the biggest threat to them is to let the nationalists rise to power as in the Vichy government of war-torn France. Once that happens, the rise of a far-right nations will lead to atrocities committed against the Syrians.
Indeed, France's biggest enemy is as white as they are.
---
Avec les nouvelles dans les médias traditionnels, l'attaque de Paris le 13 Novembre, ici à 2015 ressemble à la version française de 9-11. Toutefois, cela est seulement la propagande depuis médias traditionnels artisanat soigneusement tous les rapports de sauter aux conclusions sur les auteurs.
En outre, le jour de l'attaque, les forces de sécurité françaises effectuaient un test de leur sécurité.
Pas un hasard du tout.
Cependant, il ressemble plus à une répétition de 9-11, avec "smoking guns" tout autour.
Pourtant nous avons pas vu le café qui a été "gonflé". Je l'ai vu des gens emportés par les sites de cette attaque. Cependant, je suis toujours en attente des photos sanglantes de réfuter ma théorie que la France a créé une opération sous faux pavillon complet avec des acteurs jouant des rôles différents.
Alors que les attaques contre les dissidences français et belges est probablement vrai, la femme tuée en France n'a pas été un kamikaze. Au contraire, elle était près de la kamikaze réelle. Pourtant, les journaux une fois de plus à condition propagande affirmant qu'elle se fait exploser. En outre, l'ancien ami d'une femme marocaine vendu des photos d'elle parce qu'elle ressemble à la femelle tué lorsque la bombe a explosé. Cependant, les médias traditionnels imprimé ces photos chaque fois qu'ils mentionnent la femme décédée comme un kamikaze.
Comment ridicule! Un examen attentif de la plupart de la vie des dissidents français révèlent que la plupart d'entre eux ne sont pas des musulmans pratiquants. En effet, la plupart d'entre eux sont des utilisateurs de drogue qui sont des proies faciles pour les terroristes.
En outre, il est à cause de sentiments français qu'ils se tournent vers la drogue et des délits mineurs, pour finir au milieu d'une attaque du cru. Ces sentiments font qu'il est difficile pour les enfants musulmans français avec l'intimidation à l'école conduisant à l'abandon scolaire. Il est cette bigoterie qui mène également les dissidents bretons de Bretagne de vouloir se séparer de la France.
Ma raison de l'appel de ces soi-disant terroristes dissidents est parce qu'ils sont effectivement disefnranchised minorités françaises qui sont exclus de la société française en raison du fait qu'ils ne sont pas européens. Même si l'un d'eux se lève pour devenir valedectorian de leur école, l'élite française avec des liens conservateur laisser leurs enfants gardent les minorités à leur place.
Tant pis pour la démocratie en France. Il est seulement pour les Européens, et non pas les minorités. Cette attaque sous fausse bannière en est la preuve. Pour peu fait le savoir parisienne moyenne, mais la plus grande menace pour eux est de laisser les nationalistes montent au pouvoir comme dans le gouvernement de Vichy déchiré par la guerre de France. Une fois que cela arrive, la montée d'une extrême droite nations mènera à des atrocités commises contre les Syriens.
En effet, le plus grand ennemi de la France est blanc comme ils sont.
10 Signs Paris Shooting Was a False Flag operation: http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/paris-shooting-10-signs-false-flag/
Furthermore, on the day of the attack, French security forces were conducting a test of their security.
No coincidence at all.
However, it sounds more like a repeat of 9-11, complete with smoking guns all around.
Yet we have not seen the cafe that was "blown up." I have seen pictures of people being carried away from the sites of this attack. However, I am still awaiting the gory photos of the bomb blast site to disprove my theory that France created a false flag operation complete with actors playing different roles.
While the attacks on French and Belgian dissents is probably true, the woman killed in France was not a suicide bomber. Rather, she was near the actual suicide bomber. Yet the newspapers once again provided propaganda stating that she blew her self up. As well, a Moroccan woman's former friend sold pictures of her because she looks like the female killed when the bomb went off. However, the mainstream media printed those pictures everytime they mention the deceased female as a suicide bomber.
How ridiculous! A close examination of most of the French dissidents' lives reveal that most of them are not practising Muslims. Indeed, most of them are drug users who are easy prey for terrorists.
As well, it is because of French sentiments that they turn to drugs and petty crimes, only to end up in the midst of a homegrown attack. These sentiments make it difficult for French Muslim children with the bullying in school leading to dropping out of school. It is this bigotry that also leads the Briton dissidents of Britanny to desire to secede from France.
My reason for calling these so-called terrorists dissidents is because they are actually disefnranchised French minorities who are excluded from French society due to the fact that they are not European. Even if one of them rises to become valedectorian of their school, the French elite with conservative ties will let their children keep the minorities in their place.
So much for democracy in France. It is only for the Europeans, not the minorities. This false flag attack is proof of it. For little does the average Parisian know but the biggest threat to them is to let the nationalists rise to power as in the Vichy government of war-torn France. Once that happens, the rise of a far-right nations will lead to atrocities committed against the Syrians.
Indeed, France's biggest enemy is as white as they are.
---
Avec les nouvelles dans les médias traditionnels, l'attaque de Paris le 13 Novembre, ici à 2015 ressemble à la version française de 9-11. Toutefois, cela est seulement la propagande depuis médias traditionnels artisanat soigneusement tous les rapports de sauter aux conclusions sur les auteurs.
En outre, le jour de l'attaque, les forces de sécurité françaises effectuaient un test de leur sécurité.
Pas un hasard du tout.
Cependant, il ressemble plus à une répétition de 9-11, avec "smoking guns" tout autour.
Pourtant nous avons pas vu le café qui a été "gonflé". Je l'ai vu des gens emportés par les sites de cette attaque. Cependant, je suis toujours en attente des photos sanglantes de réfuter ma théorie que la France a créé une opération sous faux pavillon complet avec des acteurs jouant des rôles différents.
Alors que les attaques contre les dissidences français et belges est probablement vrai, la femme tuée en France n'a pas été un kamikaze. Au contraire, elle était près de la kamikaze réelle. Pourtant, les journaux une fois de plus à condition propagande affirmant qu'elle se fait exploser. En outre, l'ancien ami d'une femme marocaine vendu des photos d'elle parce qu'elle ressemble à la femelle tué lorsque la bombe a explosé. Cependant, les médias traditionnels imprimé ces photos chaque fois qu'ils mentionnent la femme décédée comme un kamikaze.
Comment ridicule! Un examen attentif de la plupart de la vie des dissidents français révèlent que la plupart d'entre eux ne sont pas des musulmans pratiquants. En effet, la plupart d'entre eux sont des utilisateurs de drogue qui sont des proies faciles pour les terroristes.
En outre, il est à cause de sentiments français qu'ils se tournent vers la drogue et des délits mineurs, pour finir au milieu d'une attaque du cru. Ces sentiments font qu'il est difficile pour les enfants musulmans français avec l'intimidation à l'école conduisant à l'abandon scolaire. Il est cette bigoterie qui mène également les dissidents bretons de Bretagne de vouloir se séparer de la France.
Ma raison de l'appel de ces soi-disant terroristes dissidents est parce qu'ils sont effectivement disefnranchised minorités françaises qui sont exclus de la société française en raison du fait qu'ils ne sont pas européens. Même si l'un d'eux se lève pour devenir valedectorian de leur école, l'élite française avec des liens conservateur laisser leurs enfants gardent les minorités à leur place.
Tant pis pour la démocratie en France. Il est seulement pour les Européens, et non pas les minorités. Cette attaque sous fausse bannière en est la preuve. Pour peu fait le savoir parisienne moyenne, mais la plus grande menace pour eux est de laisser les nationalistes montent au pouvoir comme dans le gouvernement de Vichy déchiré par la guerre de France. Une fois que cela arrive, la montée d'une extrême droite nations mènera à des atrocités commises contre les Syriens.
En effet, le plus grand ennemi de la France est blanc comme ils sont.
10 Signs Paris Shooting Was a False Flag operation: http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/paris-shooting-10-signs-false-flag/
20150922
What Do the Israeli Military, Jihadi and the West Have In Common?
For their millenarian sentiments bedevil them, leading them to unwittingly abandon a merciful God for the diabolical Anti-Christ, trading peace for warfare with a growing religious tone.
All parties fighting in the Middle East are confident that their warfare will usher in Armageddon, with millenarian Christians and Jews, both of whom are militant Zionists, pitted against radical Muslim fundamentalists (takfiri), who consider everyone else to be apostate.
Each side, be they Zionists or takfiri, sees themselves as God's chosen people and the other side as the Anti-Christ. On one side we have the Zionist army of God, consisting of pro-Israel Christian militants and their Zionist brethren, and on the other side,are the takfiri of Islamic State, al Nasrah Front, al Qaeda and associated militant groups - including Hezbollah and the radical elements of Hamas and ...
Historically, the Zionist militants and the takfiri have been fighting with each other over Palestine since the 1970s, when Israel launched attacks against the UAR, specifically Egypt and Syria, winning the Golan Height (West Bank) and the Gaza strip. At the time the Israeli military even occupied the Sinai peninsula, but later gave it back to Egypt because, being a desert wasteland, was not considered strategic territory by the Israeli government of the time.
Though the takfiri claim historical precedence that goes back to when Palestine was originally conquered by Muslims from 7th Century to 9th CE. In contrast, in recent years, radical Zionists in Israel have tried to rewrite history by denying Palestine ever existed, yet most Arab nations in the Middle East have referred to Lebanon, Palestine, and Syria as the Levant.
Meanwhile, in eastern Europe, the Ukraine has become a conflict between the West (secularism in the form of NATO representing the anti-Christ) and Russia (the Orthodox Church representing the militant Christ of Armageddon), even though this is a proxy war between American government and her NATO allies, and Russian government and her allies. In contrast, the radical Ukrainian militant nationalists adhering the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and Protestant evangelical fundamentalism consider themselves representatives of the same militant Christ fighting against the Anti-Christ (the Russian military). Though most Ukrainian nationalists are nominal Christians, adhering mainly to a neo-Nazi form of Christianity in which white power is associated with Christ.
IMHO the mainstream media is burying this story because they don't want to frighten their consumers to death with pointless end of the world stories of Armageddon, thus proving to me the old adage that few people can handle the truth, especially when religion has mixed with politics in the Middle East from the beginning over 2500 years ago. As for the Ukrainian conflict, the New Left and far right (neo-Nazi) organizations are nationalists first. If the far right in the Ukraine radicalize further, then there might be an internal struggle between the secular left and the far right radicals. However, the Ukrainian left and right are united against their common enemy, Russia.
Meanwhile, in Europe, refugees fleeing Syria are a mix of Shi'ite and Sunni Muslims and Christians while a few of the Sunni men in Syria have coalesced into rebel militant groups. This in part is due to the secondary proxy war between Sunni and Shi'ite participants with Iran supporting the Assad regime in Syria and the Gulf States supporting the Sunni rebels.
Last year, the Sunni jihadists formerly known as Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), and briefly as Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, became a de facto nation called Da'esh (Islamic State). Consisting of a Millenarian jihadi force sponsored by the Gulf States (mainly Qatar and Saudi Arabia — due to the strong offensive by Syrian army in western Syria. Then their Western sympathizers came to eastern Syria via Turkey to the border with Iraq to fight on their side, while Western mercenaries went there and allied with the Kurds to fight the Jihadi of Da'esh.
Of course, the Shi'ite refugees from Syria bypassed Iran due to its police state. Their impression that Western Europe is the bastion of freedom fuels their walk to freedom via Turkey into Europe. For the problem with the Syrian refugees is not only the Middle East; it also has to do with European fear of Islam.
How ironic that both the refugees and most of Europe nominally believe in God, be they Christians, Jews or Muslims. Indeed, this is what is common to millenarians regardless of their faith: they worship God.
In response to the refugee crisis, my solution is to propose that the Christian politicians of the West practise two of Christ Jesus' commandments: love your enemy and practice charity towards them.
Any other solution may eventually prove that the West is not yet sympathetic to the plight of the Syrian refugees, especially in Hungary.
YMMV
References:
Commentary about mainstream media hiding the Millenarian ideology common in the Israeli military: http://mondoweiss.net/2015/09/mainstream-Israeli-colonel
NY Times article mentioning the Israeli colonel's millenarian comment: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/06/opinion/thomas-friedman-revelations-in-the-gaza-war.html?referrer
The Catholic definition of millenarianism: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10307a.htm
Timeline of the name Palestine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_name_%22Palestine%22
Islam and Millenarianism: http://science.jrank.org/pages/7870/Islamic-Millenarianism.html
Russia-US talks on Syria do little to stem flow of refugees: http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/russia-u-s-talks-on-syria-do-little-to-stem-flow-of-refugees-1.3236891
Quick facts: what you need to know about Syria crisis: http://www.mercycorps.org/articles/turkey-iraq-jordan-lebanon-syria/quick-facts-what-you-need-know-about-syria-crisis
UNHCR factson the crisis in the Syrian Arab Republic: http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49e486a76.html
Robust, coherent Europe response to Refugee crisis still urgently needed: http://www.unhcr.org/55f817399.html
20141030
JIhadi or Not Jihadi (satire)
Even though the Westernized converts to the Jihadi cult are homegrown and often mentally ill and former drug addicts, it makes you wonder exactly why the rest of the jihadis in the Islamic State are assumed to be sane.
IMO if you attack people in a Western country, you are assumed to be crazy unless fit to stand trial. What that means is you comply to the demands of the State (the Majesty's court in the Commonwealth) or its equivalent elsewhere except the Middle East.
In short, the mentally ill label is misused in the case of Westernized jihadi to mean the same as cult member. Hence, the IS warriors are just as crazy as the guys who kill Canadian soldiers.
It matters not what the guy's mother said. Labels are used to separate the sane from the insane.
Thus the mass media is resorting to a form of prejudiced profiling by labeling homegrown terrorists crazy and drug addicts.
There is even denial that they are terrorists. We can explain the Ottawa shooter as a disgruntled guy who was mad he didn't get his passport.
Then the mass media can sell "crazy guy shoots up Ottawa over passport" instead of calling a jihadi a jihadi.
IMO they are jihadi because they targeted Canadian soldiers but not pedestrians in a mall. However, it makes good copy to create doubt in the news consumers' minds.
I have no such doubt: two jihadi, homegrown, one dead and the other in jail.
It is likely the State will collaborate with the man who ran over two soldier, and it will be called an act of terrorism. Since then, all soldiers are ordered in Canada to dress like a plain-clothes ninja to blend in with the rest of Canadians.
It's about time. Out of uniform is the best disguise. Now the army can route out terrorism wherever it may start, or even instigate a riot to flush out the homegrown jihadi.
UPDATE: The late M. Zehaf-Bbibeau is not a terrorist, but a former homeless drug addict who was ignored by Ottawa and the system. Most likely he was off his medication and blamed the Canadian government for ignoring his pleas for help three years ago.
Although the shooting last week in Ottawa left two people dead, this is the Conservative government's fault for their inability to treat the homeless addicts across Canada with respect and dignity that Harper et al pays daily to people who can afford rehab.
This tragedy is preventable when compassion enables the rare politician to actually listen to them with their heart.
Karma is a bitch, ain't it, Ottawa?
Reference:
http://globalnews.ca/news/1639555/why-didnt-ottawa-gunman-zehaf-bibeau-get-treatment-3-years-ago/
IMO if you attack people in a Western country, you are assumed to be crazy unless fit to stand trial. What that means is you comply to the demands of the State (the Majesty's court in the Commonwealth) or its equivalent elsewhere except the Middle East.
In short, the mentally ill label is misused in the case of Westernized jihadi to mean the same as cult member. Hence, the IS warriors are just as crazy as the guys who kill Canadian soldiers.
It matters not what the guy's mother said. Labels are used to separate the sane from the insane.
Thus the mass media is resorting to a form of prejudiced profiling by labeling homegrown terrorists crazy and drug addicts.
There is even denial that they are terrorists. We can explain the Ottawa shooter as a disgruntled guy who was mad he didn't get his passport.
Then the mass media can sell "crazy guy shoots up Ottawa over passport" instead of calling a jihadi a jihadi.
IMO they are jihadi because they targeted Canadian soldiers but not pedestrians in a mall. However, it makes good copy to create doubt in the news consumers' minds.
I have no such doubt: two jihadi, homegrown, one dead and the other in jail.
It is likely the State will collaborate with the man who ran over two soldier, and it will be called an act of terrorism. Since then, all soldiers are ordered in Canada to dress like a plain-clothes ninja to blend in with the rest of Canadians.
It's about time. Out of uniform is the best disguise. Now the army can route out terrorism wherever it may start, or even instigate a riot to flush out the homegrown jihadi.
UPDATE: The late M. Zehaf-Bbibeau is not a terrorist, but a former homeless drug addict who was ignored by Ottawa and the system. Most likely he was off his medication and blamed the Canadian government for ignoring his pleas for help three years ago.
Although the shooting last week in Ottawa left two people dead, this is the Conservative government's fault for their inability to treat the homeless addicts across Canada with respect and dignity that Harper et al pays daily to people who can afford rehab.
This tragedy is preventable when compassion enables the rare politician to actually listen to them with their heart.
Karma is a bitch, ain't it, Ottawa?
Reference:
http://globalnews.ca/news/1639555/why-didnt-ottawa-gunman-zehaf-bibeau-get-treatment-3-years-ago/
20141026
The Politics of Homegrown Jihadi (satire)
Radicalized Islam is more political than religious, and thus inspires a cult of homegrown jihadis with nothing to lose except their lives.
God Almighty has no mercy for the evil that men are capable of doing.
This is not Satan's work; the body count suggests that, despite their religious leaning, al Qaeda, Islamic State, Taleban, and other radicalized religious group including Army of God antiabortion radicals only hide behind the holiness of God himself.
For these men and women who radicalize may speak of God but their use of violence shows their materialist political activism to be a clear and present danger to society
As long as the West continues forcing its Crusade of Democracy on the Middle East, so shall we experience more attacks by lone wolf jihadi at home.
Yes, I am suggesting that the US foreign policy of forcing the Middle East to accept democracy is what is causing the Muslims to radicalize against it.
If you think the two reported incidents in recent months of radical Muslims killing Canadian soldiers had nothing to do with the Islamic State, then you are mistaken.
By trying to force democracy on Syria by tacit support of the rebels there, it became obvious that this was all a laughable cover for intrigue against Russia by the US which culminated in the Ukraine crisis.
However, the European Community is rallying around the supposed underdog, the Ukraine — controlled by a far right government — while Russia is only protecting its Russian citizens, many of whom had dual citizenship. The problem started when the new government wanted to enfranchise only Ukrainians.
In response, the far right elements of the Russian-Ukrainians rebelled, but both sides are right-wing. Very few Ukrainians and Russians are left-wing, who they view as criminals who should never hold power, due to the economic devestation that the Soviet government had caused in the Ukraine, including massive starvation.
However, the Ukrainian crisis is also a proxy war with the US government propagandizing to the Europeans and Russia aiming to protect its citizens.
All in all, both the Syrian and the Ukrainian crises are designed to polarize the world's people. The anti-Russian propaganda is almost as bad as the Russian propaganda but the Ukrainian counter-propaganda is just as bad.
As for Syria, its propaganda gets almost everything right but condones the corruption of top Syrian oligarchs. Likewise, Russia's leader Putin also condones the corruption of top Russian oligarchs with their billions being invested in the European Community.
It is only a matter of time before World War 3 flares up, should cool heads not prevail. However, what you see in each area — be it the Islamic State being carved out of northern Iraq this year, the Syrian crisis declares as of October 2011, and the Ukraine-Russia conflict — is merely the US-led West versus Russia with full support from China.
I guess the Cold War still is in its death throes, and the incident on September 11, 2001 was an aftershock with the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts a few tremors. A decade later, Arab Spring majorly affected Libya and Syria.
It is time America stopped caring about the Middle East so much that it thinks forcing democracy on Afghanistan, Iraq and now Syria will lead to peace. The resultant anarchy is a sure sign that democracy at gunpoint is not working.
Returning to the recent two incidents of homegrown terrorism in Canada, that is just karma for Harper sending 16 jets and 300 personnel to Kuwait. Nobody was surprised in Ottawa.
Remember that Kuwait also has a handful of al Qaeda veterans who were released from Gitmo not too long ago. So it is obvious that these former Jihadis are working for Kuwait, and most likely Canada and America are collaborators in a proxy war between the West and the Red axis (China and Russia).
Although it looks good to bomb northern Iraq in the news, the IS may likely be a puppet of the Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi axis, funded by oil money.
Overall, this makes us all complicit in the Middle Eastern problem every time people in the free world drive their SUVs to fill up at the gas pump. That is why I take the bus, because I have already paid for my portion of the gas to run that bus in advance. ;)
NEWS UPDATE: the Ottawa gunman purported by PM Harper and mainstream media to be a possible terrorist are false and defamatory.
M. Zehaf-Bibeau was not a homegrown terrorist — al-Qaeda, Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), and the Taleban have a tendency to lie to support their cause. I am sure Osama bin Laden did it after 9-11, which is evidenced by his first video denying involvement, but later changing his tune when he saw the effect it had on the stock market.
It looks like Zehaf-Bibeau did not get help for his addictions and mental health issues in 2011 as he demanded, simply because the homeless and poor are rejected by most drug rehabilitation centres due to their profit mentality e.g. drug rehab for profit.
At the street level, very few major cities in Canada are willing to cough up public money to put addicts requesting treatment into a treatment program, mainly because most homeless addicts in rehab will walk away because they lost the ability to await positive changes, which can take up to three or more years.
If M. Zehaf-Bibeau had entered a treatment centre for the homeless, there is a good chance that he would have gotten kicked out within a week. Therefore, this article has me bleeding heart a-going.
Therefore Ottawa's shooting scare is because their hands are not clean of how they treat the homeless addicts daily. Indeed, karma is a bitch - too bad three people had to die. May they all rest in peace.
Reference:
20140918
He Who Lives For Jihad Dies For Jihad (satire)
"These are the limits set by God. Whoever obeys God and His Messenger, He will admit him to gardens beneath which rivers flow, remaining there forever. That is a great success.
Whoever disobeys God and His Messenger and crosses the limits set by Him, He shall admit him to the Fire, remaining there forever. For him there is a humiliating punishment." - Surah 4:13-14
Thus the jihadis are losers due to crossing the limits set by God Almighty. They shall not enter Paradise, where there is no fornication.
Instead, he who has killed does not bring glory to God but sins against God.
His destination will be the Outer Darkness to that he alone has made a path.
Indeed, by choosing hatred for unbelievers, the jihadis has sealed his fate. Though he may claim to be for the Muslim community, his actions make him unclean and puts a stain on his reputation.
No one truly does the work of God when he kills in His Name. For jihadis truly are the henchmen of Iblis. In their quest for glory, they have lost the respect of the Muslim community.
What good is shariah when they who sin are condemned to death? What good is a god who is bloodthirsty? Whose God is this that brings adversity to women?
I as a Buddhist hate not the jihadi. Nor do I as a Christian wish a Crusade again terrorism. For "terrorism" is another word for "freedom fighter."
Yet there is no freedom under shariah if you are not a man. This is why the jihadis are unclean. For freedom is the condition of bring free from the negativities of action and behavior, and jihadis by their nature are negative.
Thus they are not of God Almighty but of Iblis. Who wears black but Shaitan's own? What jihadi is for Him when it is a man he serves and is happy to die for?
Any person who believes glory is on the battlefield is lost. For true believers will save other people, regardless of faith. The jihadis will kill unbelievers in the name of God. Thus they show no mercy, for only they are believers.
What vile creatures they are! God Almighty condemns them. They have lost the only battle worth fighting when they chose to kill. No honor comes to he who murders so willingly.
Only in the case of jihadis do I urge the free world to destroy. For inaction will lead to a global terrorist network that will strike at the heart of the Western world, be it Birmingham, Berlin, Chechen, Nigeria, Burma, Malaysia, Tokyo, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston, Miami, New York, Montreal, Ottawa or Vancouver.
Godspeed to the troops of NATO. Remember that this is the New Crusade to the believers. It is holy war, not a war of attrition, for they are fighting for jihad.
Why else would the Pope seek out Muslim leaders?
"He who leads into captivity shall go into captivity; he who kills with the sword shall be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints." - Revelations 13:10
Whoever disobeys God and His Messenger and crosses the limits set by Him, He shall admit him to the Fire, remaining there forever. For him there is a humiliating punishment." - Surah 4:13-14
Thus the jihadis are losers due to crossing the limits set by God Almighty. They shall not enter Paradise, where there is no fornication.
Instead, he who has killed does not bring glory to God but sins against God.
His destination will be the Outer Darkness to that he alone has made a path.
Indeed, by choosing hatred for unbelievers, the jihadis has sealed his fate. Though he may claim to be for the Muslim community, his actions make him unclean and puts a stain on his reputation.
No one truly does the work of God when he kills in His Name. For jihadis truly are the henchmen of Iblis. In their quest for glory, they have lost the respect of the Muslim community.
What good is shariah when they who sin are condemned to death? What good is a god who is bloodthirsty? Whose God is this that brings adversity to women?
I as a Buddhist hate not the jihadi. Nor do I as a Christian wish a Crusade again terrorism. For "terrorism" is another word for "freedom fighter."
Yet there is no freedom under shariah if you are not a man. This is why the jihadis are unclean. For freedom is the condition of bring free from the negativities of action and behavior, and jihadis by their nature are negative.
Thus they are not of God Almighty but of Iblis. Who wears black but Shaitan's own? What jihadi is for Him when it is a man he serves and is happy to die for?
Any person who believes glory is on the battlefield is lost. For true believers will save other people, regardless of faith. The jihadis will kill unbelievers in the name of God. Thus they show no mercy, for only they are believers.
What vile creatures they are! God Almighty condemns them. They have lost the only battle worth fighting when they chose to kill. No honor comes to he who murders so willingly.
Only in the case of jihadis do I urge the free world to destroy. For inaction will lead to a global terrorist network that will strike at the heart of the Western world, be it Birmingham, Berlin, Chechen, Nigeria, Burma, Malaysia, Tokyo, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston, Miami, New York, Montreal, Ottawa or Vancouver.
Godspeed to the troops of NATO. Remember that this is the New Crusade to the believers. It is holy war, not a war of attrition, for they are fighting for jihad.
Why else would the Pope seek out Muslim leaders?
"He who leads into captivity shall go into captivity; he who kills with the sword shall be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints." - Revelations 13:10
20140504
Islamic Terrorism an American Product? (satire)
Islamic terrorism is actually an American product.
al Qaeda was formed to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan with help from the CIA and Pakistan's ISI.
In essence Islamic terrorism has always been sponsored by the American government.
Meanwhile, domestic terrorism in America is actually Christian, e.g. Army of God. In Europe, it's not Islamists who are a threat. It's actually non-Muslim separatists. In Italy, Christian terrorists are killing Muslims.
So much for Islamic terrorism.
However, I do not believe al Qaeda and Taliban to be "Islamic" terrorists. Their imam is both a poor Islamic scholar and surgeon. Just by killing other Muslims, he is destined for the Fire. So are the martyrs, except for the suicide bombers they use.
The Islamophobes can decry Islamic terrorism as much as they want in America. It's not going to change the fact that the American government is sponsoring the al Nusrah Front and the ISIS by buying oil from OPEC and also asking Canada to secretly send home grown terrorists to Syria.
Nobody believes this because of their blind faith in America as a democracy. I find this hilarious because America has descended into fascism since 911, thanks to their politics.
I personally believe that the US secretly supports Canadian PM Stephen Harper, and if it were possible, they would keep Harper on a PM. I also believe that Canada is a rogue nation under Harper. Indeed, I liken Harper to a benign dictator rather than a democratic leader. He has propagandized against Assad, and pissed off the native people of Canada.
Yet the worst thing that Harper has done is allow home grow terrorists to fight in Syria.
Wait until the karma from that bites us in the ass.
al Qaeda was formed to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan with help from the CIA and Pakistan's ISI.
In essence Islamic terrorism has always been sponsored by the American government.
Meanwhile, domestic terrorism in America is actually Christian, e.g. Army of God. In Europe, it's not Islamists who are a threat. It's actually non-Muslim separatists. In Italy, Christian terrorists are killing Muslims.
So much for Islamic terrorism.
However, I do not believe al Qaeda and Taliban to be "Islamic" terrorists. Their imam is both a poor Islamic scholar and surgeon. Just by killing other Muslims, he is destined for the Fire. So are the martyrs, except for the suicide bombers they use.
The Islamophobes can decry Islamic terrorism as much as they want in America. It's not going to change the fact that the American government is sponsoring the al Nusrah Front and the ISIS by buying oil from OPEC and also asking Canada to secretly send home grown terrorists to Syria.
Nobody believes this because of their blind faith in America as a democracy. I find this hilarious because America has descended into fascism since 911, thanks to their politics.
I personally believe that the US secretly supports Canadian PM Stephen Harper, and if it were possible, they would keep Harper on a PM. I also believe that Canada is a rogue nation under Harper. Indeed, I liken Harper to a benign dictator rather than a democratic leader. He has propagandized against Assad, and pissed off the native people of Canada.
Yet the worst thing that Harper has done is allow home grow terrorists to fight in Syria.
Wait until the karma from that bites us in the ass.
20140405
Ennemi de Dieu / Enemy of God (satire)
Quiconque est ennemi de Gabriel -
car il fait baisser la révélation
à votre cœur par la volonté de Dieu,
une confirmation de ce qui s'est passé avant,
et des conseils et une bonne annonce
pour ceux qui croient,
Quiconque est ennemi de Dieu
et ses anges et messagers,
Gabriel et Michael, - Lo! Dieu est un ennemi
à ceux qui ne croient pas.
Quran Surah 2: 97-98 Yusuf Ali version
Whoever is an enemy to Gabriel -
for he brings down the revelation
to your heart by God's will,
a confirmation of what went before,
and guidance and glad tidings
for those who believe,
Whoever is an enemy to God
and His angels and messengers,
to Gabriel and Michael,- Lo! God is an enemy
to those who reject Faith.
Ceux qui craignent Gabriel craignent aussi Dieu.
Bien qu'ils pensent ciel est seulement pour eux,
seront surpris de la prévention des incendies.
They who fear Gabriel also fear God.
Though they think Heaven is only for them,
shall be surprised at the Fire.
It is said that when Mohammad (pbuh) replied to the Jews that Gabriel came to him to spread the message of the Quran, they expressed their fear of Gabriel due to his role in causing the walls of Jericho to fall, forgetting that the sins of the Israelite led to Jericho's fall.
In response, Gabriel spoke through Mohammad (pbuh) condemning the rejection of faith in God Almighty.
Although al-Bakarah, Surah 2, of the Quran appears at first glance anti-Semitic, rather it is a sharp rebuke to people of the Book whose egotism leads them to lack faith in God.
Thus, the Jews' hatred of Gabriel is unwarranted, since the fall of Jericho was in punishment for their lack of faith in God.
Ibn ''Abbas explained the reason of the revelation of the verse, Say: “Whoever is the enemy of Gabriel...”, in these words: “When the Prophet came to Medina, Ibn Suriya and some Jews of Fadak asked him (some questions). They said: 'O Muhammad! How do you sleep? Because we have been told about the sleep of the Prophet who would come in the last days?'
He said: 'My eyes sleep while my heart is awake.' They said: 'You are right, O Muhammad! Now tell us about the child whether it is from the man or from the woman?' He said: 'As for the bones, the nerves and the veins, they are from the man; and as for the flesh, the blood, the nails and the hairs, they are from the woman.'
They said: 'You are right, O Muhammad! Then why is it that sometimes the child resembles his paternal uncles, without having a least likeness of his maternal uncles? And sometimes he resembles his maternal uncles without having any likeness at all to his paternal uncles?' He replied: 'He resembles to that parent's (side) whose fluid dominates the other's.' They said: 'You spoke the truth, O Muhammad! Now, tell us about your Lord, what is He?' Then Allah revealed (the Chapter 112):
Say: “He, Allah is One...”
Then Ibn Suriya said: 'One (more) thing; if you tell (us) about it, I shall believe in you and follow you. Which angel is it that brings to you that which Allah reveals to you?' He said: 'Gabriel.' (Ibn Suriya) said:
'He is our enemy; he brings the (order of) fighting, hard-ship and war. And Michael brings comfort and happiness. Had it been Michael who came to you (with revelation) we would have believed in you.' ” -- Suratul Baqarah: Verses 94 − 99
It could be said Gabriel whispered in the ear of George W. Bush in the aftermath of 9-11, given the view that he is the angel of fighting, hardship and war.
However, he is also the angel of prophecy, and inspired the Quran, which is a gift from God to the Muslims. Though both Christians and Jews alike reject the Quran, the call to believe in God Almighty and to have faith in him is strong among them.
It is in error that the terms "Muslim terrorism" and "Islamist" are on the lips of Islamophobes because by generalizing terrorism and politics, they make it seem like all Muslims are terrorists and prone to bring Sharia among the rest of humanity.
This is a fallacy and runs counter to Islam itself.
For those Muslims who cry for a "Nation of Islam" that they call a Caliphate will find that it will not arise by violent action because of a bunch of fanatics dressed in black. Instead, all they will achieve is a terrorism of humanity, especially of those Muslims who are not Muslim enough for their narrow definition of what Islam is.
If their faith is so great, then why do they need guns and weapons of mass destruction? All they would need to do is pray with their fellow Muslims, educate them thoroughly, and soon Sharia shall arise.
Yet if that Sharia leads to oppression of humanity, be it Christian or Muslim, Shia or Sunni, man or woman, then these fanatics make a mockery of Islam. By killing Muslims who are not as fervent in their belief as them, they murder those people who believe there is no god but God.
How does one's faith in God justify killing their own kind? This question applies too to Christians because the Oklahoma City bombing was by a Christian terrorist. It also applies to Jews due to their terrorism practiced in the wake of the Balfour Declaration, a declaration that confirmed the British had betrayed the Hashemites and not lived up to their promise to give them the Levant.
Thus the enemies of God are the unfaithful, be it Christians, Islamists, and Jews who fight with each other, using violence be it by rhetoric or by arms. This applies to Islamophobes of all types.
However, I am an unbeliever and an apostate, being a Buddhist, and supposedly I know nothing of the ways of Christians, Jews and Muslims. Yet this is injustice, to perpetuate hatred and enmity just because of lack of faith in a merciful God.
If I can see as such, why can't people of the Book?
car il fait baisser la révélation
à votre cœur par la volonté de Dieu,
une confirmation de ce qui s'est passé avant,
et des conseils et une bonne annonce
pour ceux qui croient,
Quiconque est ennemi de Dieu
et ses anges et messagers,
Gabriel et Michael, - Lo! Dieu est un ennemi
à ceux qui ne croient pas.
Quran Surah 2: 97-98 Yusuf Ali version
Whoever is an enemy to Gabriel -
for he brings down the revelation
to your heart by God's will,
a confirmation of what went before,
and guidance and glad tidings
for those who believe,
Whoever is an enemy to God
and His angels and messengers,
to Gabriel and Michael,- Lo! God is an enemy
to those who reject Faith.
Ceux qui craignent Gabriel craignent aussi Dieu.
Bien qu'ils pensent ciel est seulement pour eux,
seront surpris de la prévention des incendies.
They who fear Gabriel also fear God.
Though they think Heaven is only for them,
shall be surprised at the Fire.
It is said that when Mohammad (pbuh) replied to the Jews that Gabriel came to him to spread the message of the Quran, they expressed their fear of Gabriel due to his role in causing the walls of Jericho to fall, forgetting that the sins of the Israelite led to Jericho's fall.
In response, Gabriel spoke through Mohammad (pbuh) condemning the rejection of faith in God Almighty.
Although al-Bakarah, Surah 2, of the Quran appears at first glance anti-Semitic, rather it is a sharp rebuke to people of the Book whose egotism leads them to lack faith in God.
Thus, the Jews' hatred of Gabriel is unwarranted, since the fall of Jericho was in punishment for their lack of faith in God.
Ibn ''Abbas explained the reason of the revelation of the verse, Say: “Whoever is the enemy of Gabriel...”, in these words: “When the Prophet came to Medina, Ibn Suriya and some Jews of Fadak asked him (some questions). They said: 'O Muhammad! How do you sleep? Because we have been told about the sleep of the Prophet who would come in the last days?'
He said: 'My eyes sleep while my heart is awake.' They said: 'You are right, O Muhammad! Now tell us about the child whether it is from the man or from the woman?' He said: 'As for the bones, the nerves and the veins, they are from the man; and as for the flesh, the blood, the nails and the hairs, they are from the woman.'
They said: 'You are right, O Muhammad! Then why is it that sometimes the child resembles his paternal uncles, without having a least likeness of his maternal uncles? And sometimes he resembles his maternal uncles without having any likeness at all to his paternal uncles?' He replied: 'He resembles to that parent's (side) whose fluid dominates the other's.' They said: 'You spoke the truth, O Muhammad! Now, tell us about your Lord, what is He?' Then Allah revealed (the Chapter 112):
Say: “He, Allah is One...”
Then Ibn Suriya said: 'One (more) thing; if you tell (us) about it, I shall believe in you and follow you. Which angel is it that brings to you that which Allah reveals to you?' He said: 'Gabriel.' (Ibn Suriya) said:
'He is our enemy; he brings the (order of) fighting, hard-ship and war. And Michael brings comfort and happiness. Had it been Michael who came to you (with revelation) we would have believed in you.' ” -- Suratul Baqarah: Verses 94 − 99
It could be said Gabriel whispered in the ear of George W. Bush in the aftermath of 9-11, given the view that he is the angel of fighting, hardship and war.
However, he is also the angel of prophecy, and inspired the Quran, which is a gift from God to the Muslims. Though both Christians and Jews alike reject the Quran, the call to believe in God Almighty and to have faith in him is strong among them.
It is in error that the terms "Muslim terrorism" and "Islamist" are on the lips of Islamophobes because by generalizing terrorism and politics, they make it seem like all Muslims are terrorists and prone to bring Sharia among the rest of humanity.
This is a fallacy and runs counter to Islam itself.
For those Muslims who cry for a "Nation of Islam" that they call a Caliphate will find that it will not arise by violent action because of a bunch of fanatics dressed in black. Instead, all they will achieve is a terrorism of humanity, especially of those Muslims who are not Muslim enough for their narrow definition of what Islam is.
If their faith is so great, then why do they need guns and weapons of mass destruction? All they would need to do is pray with their fellow Muslims, educate them thoroughly, and soon Sharia shall arise.
Yet if that Sharia leads to oppression of humanity, be it Christian or Muslim, Shia or Sunni, man or woman, then these fanatics make a mockery of Islam. By killing Muslims who are not as fervent in their belief as them, they murder those people who believe there is no god but God.
How does one's faith in God justify killing their own kind? This question applies too to Christians because the Oklahoma City bombing was by a Christian terrorist. It also applies to Jews due to their terrorism practiced in the wake of the Balfour Declaration, a declaration that confirmed the British had betrayed the Hashemites and not lived up to their promise to give them the Levant.
Thus the enemies of God are the unfaithful, be it Christians, Islamists, and Jews who fight with each other, using violence be it by rhetoric or by arms. This applies to Islamophobes of all types.
However, I am an unbeliever and an apostate, being a Buddhist, and supposedly I know nothing of the ways of Christians, Jews and Muslims. Yet this is injustice, to perpetuate hatred and enmity just because of lack of faith in a merciful God.
If I can see as such, why can't people of the Book?
20140119
Get Out of Syria, Al Qaeda Terrorists! / الخروج من سوريا وإرهابيي القاعدة
السلفية هي شكل من أشكال الفاشية الدينية عند واحد من أعضائها تطالب النساء بتغطية وجوههن ويواجه الرجال مكة المكرمة خمس مرات في اليوم بعد غسل أقدامهم للصلاة.
تنظيم القاعدة يأخذ الفكر السلفي خطوة أخرى إلى يزعمون أنهم الآحاد الله المختار وأن جميع المسلمين الآخرين هم الكافرون لحظة والاسترخاء الأصولية من خلال فصل الكنيسة والدولة.
وبالتالي هذا ليس من الإسلام في شيء. لمحمد (الحمد له) لم نشن حربا ضد المسيحيين أو اليهود. بل كان يعاقب اليهود للخيانة ثقته ومنافسيه إنهاء لادعائه النبوة.
حتى معركة الجمل ليست على وشك التمرد والردة، ولكن عن نيتبيكينج على القيادة المنتخبة مقابل القيادة الموروثة، والفرق بين الخليفة المنتخب وسلالة الأئمة.
هذا هو الانشقاق من الشيعة والسنة.
النضال السوري حفر حكومة الأقلية الشيعية، وجميعهم من العلويين، ضد الأغلبية السنية.
ما هو جبهة النصرة آل ولكن واجهة لهيمنة الأميركية في سوريا؟
ما هو آل النصرة ولكن تابعا لتنظيم القاعدة؟ ما هو تنظيم القاعدة في العراق وبلاد الشام ولكن واجهة لمجموعة أصدقاء سوريا؟
وتمول المنظمات الإرهابية على حد سواء من قبل قطر والكويت والمملكة العربية السعودية.
مجموعة سوريا الحرة هو في الواقع منظمة غير حلف شمال الاطلسي التي تمول تنظيم القاعدة والشركات التابعة لها لغزو الأراضي وإقامة الشريعة، والذي يشكل تحديا لحقوق الإنسان بسبب قمعها من الرجال والنساء والأطفال الذين يرغبون فقط في أن يكون حرا.
للشيعة والسنة على حد سواء أحرار عندما لا يحكم الشريعة أراضيهم. وبالتالي آل النصرة والقاعدة ليست في سوريا أن تطلق سراح أحد ولكن لقمعهم مع أحكام الشريعة.
— Translation: English —
Salafi is a form of religious fascism when one of its members demands that women cover their faces and men face Mecca five times a day after washing their feet to pray.
al Qaeda takes Salafi ideology a step further to claim they are Allah's Chosen Ones and that all other Muslims are unbelievers the moment they relax their fundamentalism by separating church and state.
Thus this is not Islam at all. For Mohammed (praise be unto him) did not wage war against Christians or Jew. Rather he punished the Jews for betraying his trust and terminated rivals to his claim of Prophethood.
Even the Battle of The Camel is not about rebellion and apostasy, but about nitpicking over elected leadership versus inherited leadership, and the difference between an elected Caliph and a dynasty of imams.
Such is the schism of Shi'a and Sunni.
Syria's struggle pits a Shi'a minority government, all of them Alawi, against a Sunni majority.
What is al-Nusra Front but a front for American dominance of Syria?
What is al-Nusra but an Al-Qaeda affiliate? What is al-Qaeda of Iraq and the Levant but a front for the Friends of Syria Group?
Both terrorist organizations are funded by Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
The Free Syria Group is actually a non-NATO organization that funds al-Qaeda and its affiliates to conquer territory and establish Sharia, which is a challenge to human rights due to its oppression of men, women and children who just wish to be free.
For Shi'a and Sunni alike are free when Sharia does not rule their land. Therefore Al-Nusra and al-Qaeda are not in Syria to free anyone but to oppress them with Sharia.
تنظيم القاعدة يأخذ الفكر السلفي خطوة أخرى إلى يزعمون أنهم الآحاد الله المختار وأن جميع المسلمين الآخرين هم الكافرون لحظة والاسترخاء الأصولية من خلال فصل الكنيسة والدولة.
وبالتالي هذا ليس من الإسلام في شيء. لمحمد (الحمد له) لم نشن حربا ضد المسيحيين أو اليهود. بل كان يعاقب اليهود للخيانة ثقته ومنافسيه إنهاء لادعائه النبوة.
حتى معركة الجمل ليست على وشك التمرد والردة، ولكن عن نيتبيكينج على القيادة المنتخبة مقابل القيادة الموروثة، والفرق بين الخليفة المنتخب وسلالة الأئمة.
هذا هو الانشقاق من الشيعة والسنة.
النضال السوري حفر حكومة الأقلية الشيعية، وجميعهم من العلويين، ضد الأغلبية السنية.
ما هو جبهة النصرة آل ولكن واجهة لهيمنة الأميركية في سوريا؟
ما هو آل النصرة ولكن تابعا لتنظيم القاعدة؟ ما هو تنظيم القاعدة في العراق وبلاد الشام ولكن واجهة لمجموعة أصدقاء سوريا؟
وتمول المنظمات الإرهابية على حد سواء من قبل قطر والكويت والمملكة العربية السعودية.
مجموعة سوريا الحرة هو في الواقع منظمة غير حلف شمال الاطلسي التي تمول تنظيم القاعدة والشركات التابعة لها لغزو الأراضي وإقامة الشريعة، والذي يشكل تحديا لحقوق الإنسان بسبب قمعها من الرجال والنساء والأطفال الذين يرغبون فقط في أن يكون حرا.
للشيعة والسنة على حد سواء أحرار عندما لا يحكم الشريعة أراضيهم. وبالتالي آل النصرة والقاعدة ليست في سوريا أن تطلق سراح أحد ولكن لقمعهم مع أحكام الشريعة.
— Translation: English —
Salafi is a form of religious fascism when one of its members demands that women cover their faces and men face Mecca five times a day after washing their feet to pray.
al Qaeda takes Salafi ideology a step further to claim they are Allah's Chosen Ones and that all other Muslims are unbelievers the moment they relax their fundamentalism by separating church and state.
Thus this is not Islam at all. For Mohammed (praise be unto him) did not wage war against Christians or Jew. Rather he punished the Jews for betraying his trust and terminated rivals to his claim of Prophethood.
Even the Battle of The Camel is not about rebellion and apostasy, but about nitpicking over elected leadership versus inherited leadership, and the difference between an elected Caliph and a dynasty of imams.
Such is the schism of Shi'a and Sunni.
Syria's struggle pits a Shi'a minority government, all of them Alawi, against a Sunni majority.
What is al-Nusra Front but a front for American dominance of Syria?
What is al-Nusra but an Al-Qaeda affiliate? What is al-Qaeda of Iraq and the Levant but a front for the Friends of Syria Group?
Both terrorist organizations are funded by Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
The Free Syria Group is actually a non-NATO organization that funds al-Qaeda and its affiliates to conquer territory and establish Sharia, which is a challenge to human rights due to its oppression of men, women and children who just wish to be free.
For Shi'a and Sunni alike are free when Sharia does not rule their land. Therefore Al-Nusra and al-Qaeda are not in Syria to free anyone but to oppress them with Sharia.
20140118
No one's Hands are Clean in the Middle East (satire)
State terrorism in Israel is the mother of Islamic terrorism. America supports the terrorism Israel perpetrates on Palestinians.
Ergo salafi terrorism is justifiable in the eyes of al Qaeda but not in the eyes of the West.
However Muslim terrorists, IDF and America are guilty of war crimes and facilitate terrorism.
Evidence: America supports Chechen freedom fighters. The US also supports Israel providing arms and financial aid. America does so to avoid being labelled anti-Semitic.
Israel has terrorized Palestinians since before 1948. Sharon is guilty of war crimes. For every Israeli killed by Palestinian militants Israel kills 100+. Therefore the state of Israel has been terrorizing Palestinians for over 65 years. Even the forced removal of Bedouin people is state terrorism.
As well, America condones covert racism. The Indian Wars were ethnic cleansing and genocide. Today the oppression of Hispanic illegal aliens is racist.
The oppression of poor people in North Carolina is class warfare by its elites. Its blacks in the prison population are survivors of endemic racism.
Yet without American aid Israel would be unable to terrorize Muslims living within its borders.
For the only purpose of American support of Israel is to ensure that its Muslim neighbor Iraq remains host to al Qaeda which was once a valuable CIA asset. Now the jihadis are the valuable assets of the gulf states specifically Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
As well, it is most likely that Bahrain's Arab Spring failed due to Saudi aid since the ruling party is run by Saudis.
Ergo Saudi Arabia may also facilitate and possibly support terrorism in the Middle East along with Russia and China.
However, the problem began when Great Britain and French facilitated Zionist terrorism against Palestinian Arabs before Israel's founding in 1949.
No one's hands are clean in the Middle East because it's all about the money.
Posted via Blogaway
20131102
The Mother of All Evil (satire)
The penultimate confirmation bias is when some people are convinced satan is real because of crime, war and terrorism.
What actually causes crime, war and terrorism is those nurturing moments of self esteem boosting by well meaning parents morphed into really bad Halloween costumes like the Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman-ex-wife trio and the b-gal girls, both of which got too much attention.
In the midst of their narcissism, well meaning people are letting their sense of privilege escalate into death threats. In no time, someone is going to get hurt, usually by outraged people.
Did the two girls who dressed in black-face go out on Halloween like that? Probably not.
As for the Martin, Zimmerman and ex-wife trio, the last I heard, the girl got canned from work.
On the plus side, they are all famous for the wrong reasons in the black community.
However, I am waiting for Al Sharpton to step in and weigh in because that will determine whether the outrage might lead to more black on white crime in north Philadelphia and other ethnic hotspots across the US.
At the moment though, Halloween just got its childlike innocence destroyed by the moral outrage over politically incorrect costumes.
As a result, I am sure Anonymous might be cyberstalking the guilty parties involved when the moral outrage grows strong enough to mount an online lynch mob, rather than attract violent sickos.
Meanwhile in the Middle East, all you have to do is direct a badly written movie insulting Mohammad and people riot, right after the mullahs work them into a frenzy by shouting "Death to the Great Satan!" in Iran and "Yankees go home" in Saudi Arabia.
It is ironic that that notorious movie was blamed for the killing of a US Ambassor in Libya when it actually was a militant operation designed to extract one or more of their own from the CIA compound. The reason why the CIA had captured the men: to determine where munitions ended up. It is most likely the ambassador was killed to prevent anyone in DC from knowing where those munitions ended up.
My guess is, al-Qaeda got their hands on Libyan munitions in Syria.
Meanwhile, back in America, there is little hue and cry that the US government was funneling money into the Muslim Brotherhood. In fact, the Egyptian people were outraged that America was giving the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt money directly without scrutiny by the military and overthrew Morsi.
Perhaps the CIA planned it that way, knowing how anti-American sentiments are an institution in most mosques in the Middle East, along with conspiracy theories about Zionist control over money and propaganda.
It makes the bad taste in Halloween costumes seem surreal in comparison.
Who cares about bad ideas in Halloween costumes? The really bad thing in DC is supporting al-Qaeda indirectly by siding with the rebels in Syria.
The other bad thing is supporting terrorism and war by buying gasoline for your car. Every time you gas up your dollars makes Kuwait and Saudi Arabia rich. Probably a couple pennies out of every dollar spent on gasoline supports al-Qaeda.
Yet we find this logic to be ridiculous, because in our world of mass consumption, all buying gasoline does is make the gasoline companies happy and us happy that we get to work faster to work than on public transit.
If you love your cars more than public transit in your city, could it be because your privilege of driving a car exclude your positive contribution to a safer ride on the bus? That's assuming that you are a law-abiding citizen in your SUV. Public transit needs your help riding the bus. Just make sure you practice all that socializing you learned when the masses were learning hard knocks from the school of life.
I can imagine the privileged aren't going to give up their second car due to their concern about crime on the bus. Yet they may be suffering more road rage due to air pollution and mainly the mental pollution caused by child care nurturing of self esteem by doting parents without daring to teach humility to their child, lest it traumatize them.
Meanwhile their kids love a certain cute music celebrity - take your pick which one you think is cute - who is fronting hip-hop and the culture it implies. I am not probing deeper into this culture lest I get death threats. I like my face just fine and unbroken.
Regarding that confirmation bias regarding crime, terrorism and war, it is because of laws made by the majority that visible minorities receive justice. If that justice is deserved, then it ought to be meted out humanely. Otherwise it leads to crime. If that justice is inhumane and is supported by the State, then it may become State terrorism. All other forms of terrorism are children of the State, some legitimate but mainly illegitimate. When the terrorism becomes well known, the UN may decide to wage a just war -- that is, if America does not start one to serve its own foreign policy requirements and US government obligations to whoever supported the warmongers in the Senate.
In short, confirmation bias leads to crime, terrorism and war until we only see crime, terrorism and war in the world today.
This occurs when the elites of society opt out of dealing with life. It begins with not teaching kids the value of humility for fear their self esteem will be destroyed forever. It leads to narcissism, which can be summed up as "the privileged self importance a person deserves at all times."
If you really want to stop crime, go ride a bus and share your self esteem freely. I am sure some narcissist will put you in your place.
If you want to prevent terrorism, then free everyone who does not drive by selling that second car.
If you want to prevent war, then sit your ass on the next bus and open your eyes to daily life.
For neither war, nor terrorism nor even crime is due to satan but to humanity's undeserved sense of entitlement.
Yes, I am suggesting that selfishness is evil. However, I am only referring to acts of selfishness which have a criminal component to it. This might include certain hate crimes as well. I am certain that the mass media industry is complicit in it, just to get more subscribers and even higher ratings.
In fact, I'm sure of one thing: consumerism is the mother of all evil.
Pardon me for cutting this short! I have a bus to catch.
What actually causes crime, war and terrorism is those nurturing moments of self esteem boosting by well meaning parents morphed into really bad Halloween costumes like the Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman-ex-wife trio and the b-gal girls, both of which got too much attention.
In the midst of their narcissism, well meaning people are letting their sense of privilege escalate into death threats. In no time, someone is going to get hurt, usually by outraged people.
Did the two girls who dressed in black-face go out on Halloween like that? Probably not.
As for the Martin, Zimmerman and ex-wife trio, the last I heard, the girl got canned from work.
On the plus side, they are all famous for the wrong reasons in the black community.
However, I am waiting for Al Sharpton to step in and weigh in because that will determine whether the outrage might lead to more black on white crime in north Philadelphia and other ethnic hotspots across the US.
At the moment though, Halloween just got its childlike innocence destroyed by the moral outrage over politically incorrect costumes.
As a result, I am sure Anonymous might be cyberstalking the guilty parties involved when the moral outrage grows strong enough to mount an online lynch mob, rather than attract violent sickos.
Meanwhile in the Middle East, all you have to do is direct a badly written movie insulting Mohammad and people riot, right after the mullahs work them into a frenzy by shouting "Death to the Great Satan!" in Iran and "Yankees go home" in Saudi Arabia.
It is ironic that that notorious movie was blamed for the killing of a US Ambassor in Libya when it actually was a militant operation designed to extract one or more of their own from the CIA compound. The reason why the CIA had captured the men: to determine where munitions ended up. It is most likely the ambassador was killed to prevent anyone in DC from knowing where those munitions ended up.
My guess is, al-Qaeda got their hands on Libyan munitions in Syria.
Meanwhile, back in America, there is little hue and cry that the US government was funneling money into the Muslim Brotherhood. In fact, the Egyptian people were outraged that America was giving the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt money directly without scrutiny by the military and overthrew Morsi.
Perhaps the CIA planned it that way, knowing how anti-American sentiments are an institution in most mosques in the Middle East, along with conspiracy theories about Zionist control over money and propaganda.
It makes the bad taste in Halloween costumes seem surreal in comparison.
Who cares about bad ideas in Halloween costumes? The really bad thing in DC is supporting al-Qaeda indirectly by siding with the rebels in Syria.
The other bad thing is supporting terrorism and war by buying gasoline for your car. Every time you gas up your dollars makes Kuwait and Saudi Arabia rich. Probably a couple pennies out of every dollar spent on gasoline supports al-Qaeda.
Yet we find this logic to be ridiculous, because in our world of mass consumption, all buying gasoline does is make the gasoline companies happy and us happy that we get to work faster to work than on public transit.
If you love your cars more than public transit in your city, could it be because your privilege of driving a car exclude your positive contribution to a safer ride on the bus? That's assuming that you are a law-abiding citizen in your SUV. Public transit needs your help riding the bus. Just make sure you practice all that socializing you learned when the masses were learning hard knocks from the school of life.
I can imagine the privileged aren't going to give up their second car due to their concern about crime on the bus. Yet they may be suffering more road rage due to air pollution and mainly the mental pollution caused by child care nurturing of self esteem by doting parents without daring to teach humility to their child, lest it traumatize them.
Meanwhile their kids love a certain cute music celebrity - take your pick which one you think is cute - who is fronting hip-hop and the culture it implies. I am not probing deeper into this culture lest I get death threats. I like my face just fine and unbroken.
Regarding that confirmation bias regarding crime, terrorism and war, it is because of laws made by the majority that visible minorities receive justice. If that justice is deserved, then it ought to be meted out humanely. Otherwise it leads to crime. If that justice is inhumane and is supported by the State, then it may become State terrorism. All other forms of terrorism are children of the State, some legitimate but mainly illegitimate. When the terrorism becomes well known, the UN may decide to wage a just war -- that is, if America does not start one to serve its own foreign policy requirements and US government obligations to whoever supported the warmongers in the Senate.
In short, confirmation bias leads to crime, terrorism and war until we only see crime, terrorism and war in the world today.
This occurs when the elites of society opt out of dealing with life. It begins with not teaching kids the value of humility for fear their self esteem will be destroyed forever. It leads to narcissism, which can be summed up as "the privileged self importance a person deserves at all times."
If you really want to stop crime, go ride a bus and share your self esteem freely. I am sure some narcissist will put you in your place.
If you want to prevent terrorism, then free everyone who does not drive by selling that second car.
If you want to prevent war, then sit your ass on the next bus and open your eyes to daily life.
For neither war, nor terrorism nor even crime is due to satan but to humanity's undeserved sense of entitlement.
Yes, I am suggesting that selfishness is evil. However, I am only referring to acts of selfishness which have a criminal component to it. This might include certain hate crimes as well. I am certain that the mass media industry is complicit in it, just to get more subscribers and even higher ratings.
In fact, I'm sure of one thing: consumerism is the mother of all evil.
Pardon me for cutting this short! I have a bus to catch.
20130828
To the Children of the West (satire)
Dear Children of the West:
Can you ask the leader of your country to stop the War on Terrorism because it's not working?
The 3,000 deaths in the most symbolic form of terrorism ever called the 9-11 attack on the Twin Towers in NYC was, is and never will be worth the 100,000+ deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Those terrorists even missed the most vital nerve center of the West: the Stock Exchange backup servers. Had that been hit, we would have had the Crash. America's recovery could have been delayed, and the mortgage crunch in 2008 might have dragged on, leading to more poverty and homelessness for Middle Class America.
America would have been left unable to fund Israel, and the terrorists would have wiped it out by 2010.
By 2059, most terrorist bombings would have rendered most cities in the West inhospitable. By 2060, Islam would have had more forced converts and sharia law would have been imposed beyond Dearborn and Birmingham. The end result would not be pretty: by 2100, Muslims (4 billion) would outnumber Christians and Buddhists (3.5 billion) combined in a world with almost 8 billion people
So, I am saying 911 was better than the worst-case scenario. Unfortunately, 100,000+ people dead in the Middle East will never be worth the War on Terrorism, because it has never been 911 that was the real reason for invading Afghanistan and Iraq.
It has always been natural resources of the Middle East. Anyone telling you different on FOX is a CIA dupe. Wake up!
Now it is up to you, Children of the World, to call on your leaders to make war no more.
This public message is not endorsed or funded by the New Left or any other anti-war activist group. You may return to your regular diet of pop and corn chips to play your stupid XBOX game.
Can you ask the leader of your country to stop the War on Terrorism because it's not working?
The 3,000 deaths in the most symbolic form of terrorism ever called the 9-11 attack on the Twin Towers in NYC was, is and never will be worth the 100,000+ deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Those terrorists even missed the most vital nerve center of the West: the Stock Exchange backup servers. Had that been hit, we would have had the Crash. America's recovery could have been delayed, and the mortgage crunch in 2008 might have dragged on, leading to more poverty and homelessness for Middle Class America.
America would have been left unable to fund Israel, and the terrorists would have wiped it out by 2010.
By 2059, most terrorist bombings would have rendered most cities in the West inhospitable. By 2060, Islam would have had more forced converts and sharia law would have been imposed beyond Dearborn and Birmingham. The end result would not be pretty: by 2100, Muslims (4 billion) would outnumber Christians and Buddhists (3.5 billion) combined in a world with almost 8 billion people
So, I am saying 911 was better than the worst-case scenario. Unfortunately, 100,000+ people dead in the Middle East will never be worth the War on Terrorism, because it has never been 911 that was the real reason for invading Afghanistan and Iraq.
It has always been natural resources of the Middle East. Anyone telling you different on FOX is a CIA dupe. Wake up!
Now it is up to you, Children of the World, to call on your leaders to make war no more.
This public message is not endorsed or funded by the New Left or any other anti-war activist group. You may return to your regular diet of pop and corn chips to play your stupid XBOX game.
20130814
Al-Qaeda are Actually Home-Grown Terrorists in Their Home Country
Both the war in Afghanistan and in Iraq are viewed by Muslims as a religious war, as they were originally viewed in Washington by then-president GW Bush.
Denying this is the privilege of the politically correct.
Yet as long as the Obama administration refuses to admit the religious side of this war on terrorism, they will only continue to be viewed by Muslims in the Middle East as oppressors, rather than as emancipators trying to bring democracy to Afghanistan and Iraq.
The freeing of al-Qaeda terrorists from Iraq prisons cannot be blamed on Iraq police, because the prisons they were housed in were not immune to attack as the attackers had at least one collaborator on the inside.
Yet at the same time, most of the al-Qaeda warriors in Syria are actually on the US payroll.
IMO the reason why al-Qaeda in Iraq were imprisoned had more to do with their refusal to be bribed by America to fight in its proxy war in Syria. It is also why America bombed Yemen, because Al-Qaeda there refuses to be a pawn in America's proxy wars in Libya, Egypt, and other parts of the Middle East.
Yet it is well know that al-Qaeda was originally trained by Pakistan ISI officials using US money through the CIA during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
It's not hard to conclude then that Chechen rebels in Russia might have been employed by a black-ops cell set up by the CIA to destabilize Russia.
However, it is more likely that the Chechens have a bone to pick with Moscow regarding their treatment by Russians in Chechyna and in Russia itself.
When you marginalize a minority be it Yemeni tribesmen in the clans not related to the one backing the Yemeni regime or Chechens in Russia, shit is bound to happen.
This is why Russia has Muslim terrorists: because of a racist policy regarding the Chechen including moving them to Siberia.
Originally, al-Qaeda are home-grown terrorists within their home countries, be it Chechen rebels, Iraq al-Qaeda,Yemen al-Qaeda or even Libyan al-Qaeda.
Yet America's problem with al-Qaeda is that not all of them are so easy to bribe. Yemen is proof of that.
Denying this is the privilege of the politically correct.
Yet as long as the Obama administration refuses to admit the religious side of this war on terrorism, they will only continue to be viewed by Muslims in the Middle East as oppressors, rather than as emancipators trying to bring democracy to Afghanistan and Iraq.
The freeing of al-Qaeda terrorists from Iraq prisons cannot be blamed on Iraq police, because the prisons they were housed in were not immune to attack as the attackers had at least one collaborator on the inside.
Yet at the same time, most of the al-Qaeda warriors in Syria are actually on the US payroll.
IMO the reason why al-Qaeda in Iraq were imprisoned had more to do with their refusal to be bribed by America to fight in its proxy war in Syria. It is also why America bombed Yemen, because Al-Qaeda there refuses to be a pawn in America's proxy wars in Libya, Egypt, and other parts of the Middle East.
Yet it is well know that al-Qaeda was originally trained by Pakistan ISI officials using US money through the CIA during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
It's not hard to conclude then that Chechen rebels in Russia might have been employed by a black-ops cell set up by the CIA to destabilize Russia.
However, it is more likely that the Chechens have a bone to pick with Moscow regarding their treatment by Russians in Chechyna and in Russia itself.
When you marginalize a minority be it Yemeni tribesmen in the clans not related to the one backing the Yemeni regime or Chechens in Russia, shit is bound to happen.
This is why Russia has Muslim terrorists: because of a racist policy regarding the Chechen including moving them to Siberia.
Originally, al-Qaeda are home-grown terrorists within their home countries, be it Chechen rebels, Iraq al-Qaeda,Yemen al-Qaeda or even Libyan al-Qaeda.
Yet America's problem with al-Qaeda is that not all of them are so easy to bribe. Yemen is proof of that.
20130620
Homegrown Terrorism Not Just Militant Islamic Terrorists
Militant Christianity is no different from militant Islam. The OKC bombing is one example that terrorism isn't exclusively Muslim.
If Joel's Army can be considered a Christian cult, then what is militant Islam but cultic?
While it can be said that Tamil Tigers was an example of Hindu militancy against State oppression by the Sri Lankan government, it was due to enforcement of Theravada Buddhism as state religion. This is an example where subtle State terrorism is proven to be the mother of all terrorism.
White supremacist terrorism was inspired by Waco, which has become a paramilitary organization due to the ideology of the church David Koresh took over at gunpoint. This too is a form of terrorism.
In Israel, Jewish militants are found among the Hasidic Jews, who are the reason why the Hamas are in West Bank. Strategically, Israel has called the militants "fellow Jews" and labelled the Hamas an extremely dangerous terrorist organization dedicated to wiping Israel off the maps.
After 9-11, mass media focused on militant Islamic terrorism and rarely compared it to the radical homegrown Christian terrorism in America. This includes the assassinations of abortion doctors by Christian militants.
It is these kinds of terrorists who are now ignored by mass media, to the point where they are deemed "mentally ill" and/or "probably on drugs" rather than as the terrorist they truly are.
In contrast, social activism that verges on terrorism is diabolized as domestic terrorism, when not one so-called "terrorist act" by such a group has killed a single person since 1999.
Reference:
Joel's Army: the new face of militant Christian terrorism? : http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2008/fall/arming-for-armageddon#.UcMuslRDubU
If Joel's Army can be considered a Christian cult, then what is militant Islam but cultic?
While it can be said that Tamil Tigers was an example of Hindu militancy against State oppression by the Sri Lankan government, it was due to enforcement of Theravada Buddhism as state religion. This is an example where subtle State terrorism is proven to be the mother of all terrorism.
White supremacist terrorism was inspired by Waco, which has become a paramilitary organization due to the ideology of the church David Koresh took over at gunpoint. This too is a form of terrorism.
In Israel, Jewish militants are found among the Hasidic Jews, who are the reason why the Hamas are in West Bank. Strategically, Israel has called the militants "fellow Jews" and labelled the Hamas an extremely dangerous terrorist organization dedicated to wiping Israel off the maps.
After 9-11, mass media focused on militant Islamic terrorism and rarely compared it to the radical homegrown Christian terrorism in America. This includes the assassinations of abortion doctors by Christian militants.
It is these kinds of terrorists who are now ignored by mass media, to the point where they are deemed "mentally ill" and/or "probably on drugs" rather than as the terrorist they truly are.
In contrast, social activism that verges on terrorism is diabolized as domestic terrorism, when not one so-called "terrorist act" by such a group has killed a single person since 1999.
Reference:
Joel's Army: the new face of militant Christian terrorism? : http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2008/fall/arming-for-armageddon#.UcMuslRDubU
20130119
Theravada Buddhism in Sri Lanka and Burma and Its Influence on Nationalism
Considering the Theravada stream of Buddhism in countries such as Sri Lanka and Burma, the Buddhist monks wield a lot of power.
Due to their influence in Sri Lanka, the government instituted a Sinhala-only policy which led Sinhala nationalists to attack Tamils and Sinhala people who protected Tamils. This led to civil war and only ended when Sri Lankan army killed the leader of the Tamil Tigers. The Sinhala-only policy was the result of early oppression of Buddhists by Christian and Hindu peoples during the colonial era.
Today, the civil war has ended. The last leader Pathmanathan of the Tamil Tigers was captured in 2009, and collaborated with the Sri Lankan government, exposing the Tamil crime network. Afterwards, Pathmanathan created an NGO to rehabilitate his people.
This year on the Bangladesh-Myanmar border, Myanmar Buddhists of Rakhine State are in conflict with Rohingya Muslims. After a Rakhine woman was raped in June, a Rakhine mob killed 10 Rohingya men. Since then, the violence has escalated to the point where both Rohingya and Rakhine leaders have condemned it. Buddhist organizations in Myanmar which supported democracy are blocking humanitarian aid to the Rohingya Muslims. In October, another riot occurred. Myanmar classified the Rohingyas as immigrants and thus not eligible for citizenship
Ironically, Bangladesh claims they are too poor to open up refugee camps for the Rohingya. If this is true, then most likely it is because international bankers have ruined Bangladeshi economy.
In both cases though, British colonialism appears to have been the facilitator of oppression against Buddhists which led to later strife in Sri Lanka.
In the case of Myanmar, British colonialism led to Burma being taken over by Indians, mostly Muslim. By the time British authorities realized the danger of ethnic rivalry between Rohingya and Rakhine peoples Japan had invaded Burma.
After WW2, much of the seeds for strife was sown when mujahids were formed for holy war, first to separate Mayu frontier from Arakan province in Burma and annex it with East Pakistan. When that was suppressed, mujahideens then rose up during Bangladesh independence in 1971. In recent years, the mujahideens wish for an independent or autonomous Mayu.
Sadly though, because the British Empire became no more after WW2, its subsequent decolonization and decline means that the UK no longer is obliged to undo what it has done to Sri Lanka and Burma prior to WW2 i.e. allowing free migration of Indians. Nationalism has helped alleviate resentment in both Sri Lanka and Burma, as most Indians returned to the newly formed India.
In both nations, the Theravada Buddhists are biased against non-Buddhists. When Buddhism is combined with nationalism, it sometimes results in sectarian violence against a minority of a different religion (Tamil Hindus in Sri Lanka and Rohingya Muslims in Burma.
References:
Sri Lanka Civil War: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_civil_war
2012 Rakhine State riots: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Rakhine_State_riots
Rohingya history:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya#History
Due to their influence in Sri Lanka, the government instituted a Sinhala-only policy which led Sinhala nationalists to attack Tamils and Sinhala people who protected Tamils. This led to civil war and only ended when Sri Lankan army killed the leader of the Tamil Tigers. The Sinhala-only policy was the result of early oppression of Buddhists by Christian and Hindu peoples during the colonial era.
Today, the civil war has ended. The last leader Pathmanathan of the Tamil Tigers was captured in 2009, and collaborated with the Sri Lankan government, exposing the Tamil crime network. Afterwards, Pathmanathan created an NGO to rehabilitate his people.
This year on the Bangladesh-Myanmar border, Myanmar Buddhists of Rakhine State are in conflict with Rohingya Muslims. After a Rakhine woman was raped in June, a Rakhine mob killed 10 Rohingya men. Since then, the violence has escalated to the point where both Rohingya and Rakhine leaders have condemned it. Buddhist organizations in Myanmar which supported democracy are blocking humanitarian aid to the Rohingya Muslims. In October, another riot occurred. Myanmar classified the Rohingyas as immigrants and thus not eligible for citizenship
Ironically, Bangladesh claims they are too poor to open up refugee camps for the Rohingya. If this is true, then most likely it is because international bankers have ruined Bangladeshi economy.
In both cases though, British colonialism appears to have been the facilitator of oppression against Buddhists which led to later strife in Sri Lanka.
In the case of Myanmar, British colonialism led to Burma being taken over by Indians, mostly Muslim. By the time British authorities realized the danger of ethnic rivalry between Rohingya and Rakhine peoples Japan had invaded Burma.
After WW2, much of the seeds for strife was sown when mujahids were formed for holy war, first to separate Mayu frontier from Arakan province in Burma and annex it with East Pakistan. When that was suppressed, mujahideens then rose up during Bangladesh independence in 1971. In recent years, the mujahideens wish for an independent or autonomous Mayu.
Sadly though, because the British Empire became no more after WW2, its subsequent decolonization and decline means that the UK no longer is obliged to undo what it has done to Sri Lanka and Burma prior to WW2 i.e. allowing free migration of Indians. Nationalism has helped alleviate resentment in both Sri Lanka and Burma, as most Indians returned to the newly formed India.
In both nations, the Theravada Buddhists are biased against non-Buddhists. When Buddhism is combined with nationalism, it sometimes results in sectarian violence against a minority of a different religion (Tamil Hindus in Sri Lanka and Rohingya Muslims in Burma.
References:
Sri Lanka Civil War: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_civil_war
2012 Rakhine State riots: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Rakhine_State_riots
Rohingya history:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya#History
20121119
9-11 Was Never the Reason for "war on terrorism"
Afghanistan wasn't invaded because of 9-11. It was invaded to get Osama bin Laden for terrorist plots in America predating 9-11.
After initial denial on Sept 16, 2001, Osama waited 3 years before claiming responsibility for 9-11, on Oct. 18, 2004. This date is important because it was over 6 months since Lt. General Petraeus had pulled out of Iraq, leaving behind a Stryker force and a small command centre at Mosul. By then Iraq was in the middle of a civil war that Petraeus couldn't stop when he left in February 2004.
Why? Because the rebels loyal to Saddam Hussein were defending their homeland from an unprovoked invasion based on the rumor that Iraq had caches of WMD, none of which were ever found.
This fabrication of WND was helped by one of Iraqi American Ahmed Chalabi's contacts in his Iraq National Congress (founded in 1992 as a front to funnel US money into Chalabi's hands). It is possible part of this money was used in the $32 million offer to bank customers bilked of money in the 1970s when Petra Bank in Jordan failed to pony up 1/3 of its money in the Central Bank and Chalabi fled the country with his clients' money.
Since 1998 INC collaborated with Judith Miller of NY Times to plant stories of WMD in Iraq. This propaganda helped to convince the UN to go to war in 2003, not 9-11.
Other journalists that helped Chalabi include American Enterprise Institute's Iraq specialist Danielle Pletka, whoi defended him; and the Irish scriptwriter and commentator Eoghan Harris, who coached him on presentation techniques i.e. how to act in front of a camera.
However when Lt. General Petraeus left Iraq in February 2004, Chalabi commented on the WMD controversy, "We are heroes in error. As far as we're concerned, we've been entirely successful. That tyrant Saddam is gone and the Americans are in Baghdad. What was said before is not important. The Bush administration is looking for a scapegoat."
I guess executing Hussein wasn't enough for the Americans, so they went after a fraudster who's friends with DC, a Shi'ite Muslim who had a few papers on advanced algebra as graduating as a mathematician and a loyal Iraqi-American.
YES, 9-11 HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE IRAQ WAR or the AFGHANISTAN WAR!
Afghanistan was invaded to get Osama bin Laden, and to eliminate Qaeda militants.
Iraq was invaded to get its oil.
After initial denial on Sept 16, 2001, Osama waited 3 years before claiming responsibility for 9-11, on Oct. 18, 2004. This date is important because it was over 6 months since Lt. General Petraeus had pulled out of Iraq, leaving behind a Stryker force and a small command centre at Mosul. By then Iraq was in the middle of a civil war that Petraeus couldn't stop when he left in February 2004.
Why? Because the rebels loyal to Saddam Hussein were defending their homeland from an unprovoked invasion based on the rumor that Iraq had caches of WMD, none of which were ever found.
This fabrication of WND was helped by one of Iraqi American Ahmed Chalabi's contacts in his Iraq National Congress (founded in 1992 as a front to funnel US money into Chalabi's hands). It is possible part of this money was used in the $32 million offer to bank customers bilked of money in the 1970s when Petra Bank in Jordan failed to pony up 1/3 of its money in the Central Bank and Chalabi fled the country with his clients' money.
Since 1998 INC collaborated with Judith Miller of NY Times to plant stories of WMD in Iraq. This propaganda helped to convince the UN to go to war in 2003, not 9-11.
Other journalists that helped Chalabi include American Enterprise Institute's Iraq specialist Danielle Pletka, whoi defended him; and the Irish scriptwriter and commentator Eoghan Harris, who coached him on presentation techniques i.e. how to act in front of a camera.
However when Lt. General Petraeus left Iraq in February 2004, Chalabi commented on the WMD controversy, "We are heroes in error. As far as we're concerned, we've been entirely successful. That tyrant Saddam is gone and the Americans are in Baghdad. What was said before is not important. The Bush administration is looking for a scapegoat."
I guess executing Hussein wasn't enough for the Americans, so they went after a fraudster who's friends with DC, a Shi'ite Muslim who had a few papers on advanced algebra as graduating as a mathematician and a loyal Iraqi-American.
YES, 9-11 HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE IRAQ WAR or the AFGHANISTAN WAR!
Afghanistan was invaded to get Osama bin Laden, and to eliminate Qaeda militants.
Iraq was invaded to get its oil.
20121017
Be A Vigilante For the People, By the People, and Of the People (satire)
A common reaction to hyper-vigilance by the State is to stay at home.
It's more prudent to be vigilant of the State by observing what they do when they take down anyone who they suspect of terrorist activity.
Remember: agents of the State are State-sponsored terrorists when they terrorize the People. Agents of State terrorism light the fuse of tomorrow's global terrorists.
Choosing to stay home will lead to hikikomori.
People who never leave home tend to become so neurotic they think they have an anxiety disorder, or even a personality disorder.
Looking at four walls all day leads to cabin fever.
Get out and be vigilant of the State. It is not vigilanté-ism; it is the right of the People. So carefully observe the State.
Be a vigilanté for the People, by the People and of the People! Non-violent confrontation is allowable.
When the sheep look up, the wolves are already among us. When the wolves in sheep's clothing are exposed, stop being sheep and confront the wolves.
Or, you could stay at home and end up becoming hikikomori only to suddenly see your parents and/or loved ones hurt by your cowardice.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hikikomori
It's more prudent to be vigilant of the State by observing what they do when they take down anyone who they suspect of terrorist activity.
Remember: agents of the State are State-sponsored terrorists when they terrorize the People. Agents of State terrorism light the fuse of tomorrow's global terrorists.
Choosing to stay home will lead to hikikomori.
People who never leave home tend to become so neurotic they think they have an anxiety disorder, or even a personality disorder.
Looking at four walls all day leads to cabin fever.
Get out and be vigilant of the State. It is not vigilanté-ism; it is the right of the People. So carefully observe the State.
Be a vigilanté for the People, by the People and of the People! Non-violent confrontation is allowable.
When the sheep look up, the wolves are already among us. When the wolves in sheep's clothing are exposed, stop being sheep and confront the wolves.
Or, you could stay at home and end up becoming hikikomori only to suddenly see your parents and/or loved ones hurt by your cowardice.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hikikomori
Dear Monotheists, Be it Christian, Jewish or Moslem
Your denial that Christianity is a syncretistic religion overlooked the fact that much of Christendom believes in the neo-Plastonic, and inherently pagan, concept of an immortal soul.
Truth is, nothing, not even the soul, lasts forever.
So my Buddhist truths make your holier-than-thou and anti-Nature view of man a form of terrorism.
The same goes for any monotheism that pretends good and evil are in eternal conflict. I have no apologies to fanatics from Christianity, Judaism and Islam.
Your actions terrorized people in the past, and they continue to terrorize innocent people today throughout the world.
This is because of a positive acceptance of egotism, and because of it, Christians have fallen, Jews have been persecuted, and Muslims have burned embassies and killed ambassadors.
It is said that the greater jihad is not in killing the unbelievers but in controlling your desires.
Please meditate on what I have written before you reply.
Signed
A Buddhist
Truth is, nothing, not even the soul, lasts forever.
So my Buddhist truths make your holier-than-thou and anti-Nature view of man a form of terrorism.
The same goes for any monotheism that pretends good and evil are in eternal conflict. I have no apologies to fanatics from Christianity, Judaism and Islam.
Your actions terrorized people in the past, and they continue to terrorize innocent people today throughout the world.
This is because of a positive acceptance of egotism, and because of it, Christians have fallen, Jews have been persecuted, and Muslims have burned embassies and killed ambassadors.
It is said that the greater jihad is not in killing the unbelievers but in controlling your desires.
Please meditate on what I have written before you reply.
Signed
A Buddhist
Recent Events Prove State Terrorism Proven to be Mother of All Terrorism
The recent teenaged suicide in BC and the online mob forming along with the misinformation due to the cyber-bullies' hidden agenda is unsurprising. Likewise, the prostitution issue in a sleepy Eastcoast town only further proves my original generalization about terrorism.
It is proof that the State, be it police or other agents of the State, including those of the People who are willing to pay more taxes for more police and control of others of the People, does practice terrorism on the People.
However, we do not view it as terrorism because the State regulates the level of violence by its agents.
If any of the People go on to bully and terrorize others, then my contention that State terrorism is the mother of all terrorism is proven.
Yes, I am accusing both the cyberbullies and the agents of the State of terrorism: cyber-bullies are online terrorists when they harass any member of the People unmercifully to the point of suicide, and police and other agents of the State are agents of State terrorism when they shame a targeted sector of the People repeatedly.
Thus, when the sheep (the bullied and the sector of the People who passively watch the terrorism being acted out both online and in real life) look up, they should be aware that if their outrage to being terrorized results in the same kind of behavior as their bullies, their oppressers, and their handlers, then they too become bullies, too.
However, the continued dialogue is important as long as each and every person is able to use the forum of public opinion to air their side of this current war on online bullying.
For no one here is innocent, not even I.
It is proof that the State, be it police or other agents of the State, including those of the People who are willing to pay more taxes for more police and control of others of the People, does practice terrorism on the People.
However, we do not view it as terrorism because the State regulates the level of violence by its agents.
If any of the People go on to bully and terrorize others, then my contention that State terrorism is the mother of all terrorism is proven.
Yes, I am accusing both the cyberbullies and the agents of the State of terrorism: cyber-bullies are online terrorists when they harass any member of the People unmercifully to the point of suicide, and police and other agents of the State are agents of State terrorism when they shame a targeted sector of the People repeatedly.
Thus, when the sheep (the bullied and the sector of the People who passively watch the terrorism being acted out both online and in real life) look up, they should be aware that if their outrage to being terrorized results in the same kind of behavior as their bullies, their oppressers, and their handlers, then they too become bullies, too.
However, the continued dialogue is important as long as each and every person is able to use the forum of public opinion to air their side of this current war on online bullying.
For no one here is innocent, not even I.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)