Mainstream media is full of the modern-day equivalent of myths and superstition e.g. Zionists rule the world. Popular culture is probably a modern paganism e.g. the worship of celebrities. Even science is worshipped, as are certain politician e.g. Chomsky and Sagan.
This is what I call secular religionism. Not even are free of this because no one is immune to belief and faith.
Without belief, we doubt reality. Without faith, we are nothing but pathetic creatures. Hence the rise in sales of antidepressant after 9-11 is because a tragedy destroys our faith in the reality of our own making ("America is invincible").
Even atheists are not immune to this ability of the human mind to create an inner narrative in a desperate attempt to adapt to the rapidly changing physical reality of our existence.
Why else do they rail against religionists of the Abrahamic faith (Judaism, Christianity and Islam)? Why else do they not even have the patience to sit with religionists to cobble together a code of conduct?
Perhaps a few atheists and religionists are so fucking smart that they are this close to being crazy. For genius may be the positive side of madness.
Often they do not make sense to me e.g. "the more often you insist the truth is real, the most likely it may be a lie." This kind of fallacy implies that truth tellers are liars and covert sociopaths. That would depend on whether a truth teller is willing to do anything to expose the lies which help maintain the dreamworld of modern existence.
One of the biggest examples of this sociopathy that makes up the reality of life is the Amanda Todd story. Mainstream media is pimping the fantasy that an online stalker is the cause of Amanda's death by suicide when, in actual fact, it was the loss of mother love that led to her untimely death.
So I urge the truth tellers to expose the lies about the suicides of other girls like Amanda Todd. In each related case, there are clues pointing to mental illness like depression and even bipolar disorder. In a recent rape case that resulted in the girl's suicide, she was a willing participant in seuxal activity.
However, the boys who posted the video to the Internet are nothing but pornographers and online bullies. Likewise, the online bullies of Amanda Todd used to be her best friends.
I doubt anyone would believe what I have written in this post. Indeed, I insist that you research the Amanda Todd case instead of falling for the propaganda the mainstream media is feeding you. To help you, the tags attached to this post will point you in the right direction.
If, on the other hand, you believe I am lying, then it is because nobody can handle the truth, not even you.
Deal with it.
Showing posts with label cyber-bullying. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cyber-bullying. Show all posts
20140909
Stop Bullying Wherever It Occurs
Disclaimer: this is not another anti-gay rant. This is an anti-bullying rant.
Remember that boy who hung himself cos he misunderstood when his classmates called him GAY when they actually meant he was LAME for wearing a My Little Pony knapsack to school?
Well, his suicide confirmed it.
Killing yourself for being called name? That's -GAY- LAME.
*CAN YOU KIDS BE MORE CLEAR AND USE THE WORD* LAME *RATHER THAN THE WORD* GAY COS IT IS MORE GAY TO ABUSE A LAME WORD LIKE *GAY* AND THEN SAY *"I AM KIDDING. CHILL?"*
It is often bullying to call people names repeatedly until they cry or get angry.
Nobody believes in the rhyme that "sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me", not when everyone is afraid to stop such ad hominem attacks that are fallacies, and possibly evidence of potential sociopathic behavior among the bullies because when you say a lie repeatedly, it begins to ring true.
And life is indeed full of white lies, to hide the true that will set you free.
Remember that boy who hung himself cos he misunderstood when his classmates called him GAY when they actually meant he was LAME for wearing a My Little Pony knapsack to school?
Well, his suicide confirmed it.
Killing yourself for being called name? That's -GAY- LAME.
*CAN YOU KIDS BE MORE CLEAR AND USE THE WORD* LAME *RATHER THAN THE WORD* GAY COS IT IS MORE GAY TO ABUSE A LAME WORD LIKE *GAY* AND THEN SAY *"I AM KIDDING. CHILL?"*
It is often bullying to call people names repeatedly until they cry or get angry.
Nobody believes in the rhyme that "sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me", not when everyone is afraid to stop such ad hominem attacks that are fallacies, and possibly evidence of potential sociopathic behavior among the bullies because when you say a lie repeatedly, it begins to ring true.
And life is indeed full of white lies, to hide the true that will set you free.
20140507
Bill C-13: Two Possible Police Entrapment Scenarios (satire)
Here's a couple scenarios for police to try once Bill C-13 is law in Canada:
This would be a vice operation.
Get the lady officer who looks the youngest to play an innocent teen, and then proceed to entrap sex perverts on Omegle, Kik, Yahoo, Skype.
Use prepaid phones for texting if it calls for it. However, have at least two older cops as backup, and to play the "parents".
A variation on the above scenario would be playing an amateur webcam model. The perverts wanting a "private show" will begin harassment and verbal abuse that will have a digital trail.
Onsite should be a hacker to track down IP addresses if need be. However, since the pervert will need to call voice, the prepaid phone is essential for a bust.
The same blackmail risk applies, because he is using coercion to get compliance, which is in itself emotional blackmail.
I can't believe anyone would be so paranoid to believe just by liking this post, you're open to spying by CSEC or NSA.
Believe me, if they thought anything I posted was a "terrorist threat", they would have kicked my doors down when I was still on Facebook back in 2007.
This would be a vice operation.
Get the lady officer who looks the youngest to play an innocent teen, and then proceed to entrap sex perverts on Omegle, Kik, Yahoo, Skype.
Use prepaid phones for texting if it calls for it. However, have at least two older cops as backup, and to play the "parents".
A variation on the above scenario would be playing an amateur webcam model. The perverts wanting a "private show" will begin harassment and verbal abuse that will have a digital trail.
Onsite should be a hacker to track down IP addresses if need be. However, since the pervert will need to call voice, the prepaid phone is essential for a bust.
The same blackmail risk applies, because he is using coercion to get compliance, which is in itself emotional blackmail.
I can't believe anyone would be so paranoid to believe just by liking this post, you're open to spying by CSEC or NSA.
Believe me, if they thought anything I posted was a "terrorist threat", they would have kicked my doors down when I was still on Facebook back in 2007.
20121017
Recent Events Prove State Terrorism Proven to be Mother of All Terrorism
The recent teenaged suicide in BC and the online mob forming along with the misinformation due to the cyber-bullies' hidden agenda is unsurprising. Likewise, the prostitution issue in a sleepy Eastcoast town only further proves my original generalization about terrorism.
It is proof that the State, be it police or other agents of the State, including those of the People who are willing to pay more taxes for more police and control of others of the People, does practice terrorism on the People.
However, we do not view it as terrorism because the State regulates the level of violence by its agents.
If any of the People go on to bully and terrorize others, then my contention that State terrorism is the mother of all terrorism is proven.
Yes, I am accusing both the cyberbullies and the agents of the State of terrorism: cyber-bullies are online terrorists when they harass any member of the People unmercifully to the point of suicide, and police and other agents of the State are agents of State terrorism when they shame a targeted sector of the People repeatedly.
Thus, when the sheep (the bullied and the sector of the People who passively watch the terrorism being acted out both online and in real life) look up, they should be aware that if their outrage to being terrorized results in the same kind of behavior as their bullies, their oppressers, and their handlers, then they too become bullies, too.
However, the continued dialogue is important as long as each and every person is able to use the forum of public opinion to air their side of this current war on online bullying.
For no one here is innocent, not even I.
It is proof that the State, be it police or other agents of the State, including those of the People who are willing to pay more taxes for more police and control of others of the People, does practice terrorism on the People.
However, we do not view it as terrorism because the State regulates the level of violence by its agents.
If any of the People go on to bully and terrorize others, then my contention that State terrorism is the mother of all terrorism is proven.
Yes, I am accusing both the cyberbullies and the agents of the State of terrorism: cyber-bullies are online terrorists when they harass any member of the People unmercifully to the point of suicide, and police and other agents of the State are agents of State terrorism when they shame a targeted sector of the People repeatedly.
Thus, when the sheep (the bullied and the sector of the People who passively watch the terrorism being acted out both online and in real life) look up, they should be aware that if their outrage to being terrorized results in the same kind of behavior as their bullies, their oppressers, and their handlers, then they too become bullies, too.
However, the continued dialogue is important as long as each and every person is able to use the forum of public opinion to air their side of this current war on online bullying.
For no one here is innocent, not even I.
20121016
Concerned Citizen Does the Right Thing for Bullied Student
A report from an Ontario doctor's wife comes from a currently undisclosed website in a comment thread about how to protect children from cyber-bullying.
She helped one of her patients, 14 year old girl who was bullied at school.
When she called the school, she got the run-around: the secretary said she didn't go there, after being asked three times to look for her.
When the doctor's wife talked to the principal in charge of the girl, the principal had never heard of her. The guidance counselor had sent her to a psychiatric community centre for counseling.
The girl's time at the centre got her into trouble - her words were used against her.
As a result, the mother nearly lost both her children to Children's Aid.
So the doctor's wife took her out of school since it was May. Then she filed a complaint against the unregistered mental health worker at CA.
As for the girl, she finished her school year at home.
Later, the woman's husband went with her to their MPP to protest the neglect going on in that girl's school and the use of entrapment to threaten the child's mother.
My guess is, the mother of the child was a single mother on welfare. Also it appears that in response to the bullying, the school's guidance counselor wrongly guessed the girl had a psychiatric problem.
It's more likely the school bullies had influential parents and that factored strongly on the outcome for this child.
She helped one of her patients, 14 year old girl who was bullied at school.
When she called the school, she got the run-around: the secretary said she didn't go there, after being asked three times to look for her.
When the doctor's wife talked to the principal in charge of the girl, the principal had never heard of her. The guidance counselor had sent her to a psychiatric community centre for counseling.
The girl's time at the centre got her into trouble - her words were used against her.
As a result, the mother nearly lost both her children to Children's Aid.
So the doctor's wife took her out of school since it was May. Then she filed a complaint against the unregistered mental health worker at CA.
As for the girl, she finished her school year at home.
Later, the woman's husband went with her to their MPP to protest the neglect going on in that girl's school and the use of entrapment to threaten the child's mother.
My guess is, the mother of the child was a single mother on welfare. Also it appears that in response to the bullying, the school's guidance counselor wrongly guessed the girl had a psychiatric problem.
It's more likely the school bullies had influential parents and that factored strongly on the outcome for this child.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)