Search This Blog

Showing posts with label RCMP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RCMP. Show all posts

20150319

When Good Men Failed To Act (satire)

IMO 911 happened is because nobody from the CIA to the FBI to the POTUS acted on information to stop it from happening.

Instead they let it happen, so that they could invade Afghanistan and Iraq, illegally detain terrorists at Gitmo and other highly questionable acts, all in the name of fighting terrorism.

Yet there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Thank you very much for the smoke and mirrors, Bush and Cheney.

Now, Obama is using drones to kill terrorists in Pakistan and Yemen, including US citizens because that is cheaper than capturing them and subjecting them to a trial.

Soon the world would become a sousveillance world where those in power will control who can use cameras and when they can be used.

As well, children are being surreptitiously "trained" to act before a camera on Younow so that they will either parlay it into a broadcasting career or failing that, a webcam career.

Our privacy rights are constantly threatened, and yet everyone who catches the bug wants to broadcast, giving up their right to privacy for fame and to make a quick buck.

All because good men in high place fail to act!

Now they plan to make up for it in Canada by proposing a law that has the potential to create a massive surveillance network in Canada.

Originally posted on May 23, 2014 1:26 AM PDT

Reference:

Sousveillance: plusmagazine.com/2014/10/07/sousveillance-surveillance-kind-future-want/

Bill C-51 Would Create a Massive Surveillance Network Affecting All Canadians: http://www.techvibes.com/blog/bill-c-51-surveillance-network-2015-03-18

20140909

Be lewd, Not Nude, On the net (satire)

Children these days still run away from home with their BFF, but they beat them up and shave them bald, to psych out their competition so they can desperately get attention from boys until they get pregnant. That is called, "having a life."

That's why Tallulah Bankhead was lewd and a bisexual sex monster in the 1930s, because that is how "bad" girls did it in great-Grandmama's day. The coke just cut the edge off.

Today, the lewd teens know about illegal drugs, drinking, oral sex, condoms, sextoys, flashing titties onlie, younow, Amanda Todd, and how to love themselves so they don't "steal" their BFF's BF, get beat up in front of their peers, drink bleach, etc. just cos they lost the love of their parents due to be lewd.

At least they weren,t as nude as Amanda got.

Even so, parents should stop judging their kids for being lewd and then deprive their children of love until they get addicted to the internet to get the attention they so desperately want from their MOMs and DADs until they flash their titties while getting nude and worse, like glowstick love. >:)

Otherwise they are going continue to commit suicide, just because parents cut them off from their love and attention, just for having a sex life. And governments are going to police the net until everyone is accused of being a pedobear, a stalker, and other thoughtcrime.

Just for not being aware that lewdness is a violation of internet etiquette and nudity means their well meaning friends exercise their bullying for the good of all.

Well, I accuse all of Amanda Todd's friends of creating the lewd monster she became. At least she was notorious. Y'all are just a bunch of successful sociopaths in training, but she failed to be one, thanks to your reverse psychology.

Now forget what I ranted about, and shut off your computer. You need to have a life because "there is no life on the net."

Karma is a bitch, but it cannot return Amanda. By hiding the truth from the world and letting the propaganda machine called Carol Todd carry on, you ex-friends of "dat bitch" Amanda 'glowsticks' Todd, you all shall lead interesting lives.

Even you RCMP, especially with your "we can't do anything for you until you get Amanda off the Internet for seven weeks" but nobody even addressing her Internet addiction thanks to lack of motherly love.

Let the expert propagandist Carol Todd talk, while you all try to restrict the Internet "to stop internet bullying" when the truth will set you free.

Now forget I wrote this and shut off your computer. Get out and have a life, because like me, if you read up to this point, you are a computer addict and say the first step clearly: Hello, my name is -Stephen- and I am an Internet Addict, my life is unmanageable and I am powerless over it.

Nobody has the right to be on the Internet for days. In due time it will cause mental illness, marital discord, divorce, and loneliness.

However, addicts will continue to abuse others on the Net until they have lost their access, their homes, and sometimes, their lives. Few people seek help. So I have provided it again and again even though it hurts every time.

Life has gotten interesting for all parties indeed.

20140618

You Failed, DEA! (satire)




Recent news that the War on Drugs is a dismal failure brought a smile to my face.

To the DEA and the RCMP in Canada: "I told you so." Your anti-cannabis agenda was never about eradicating a dangerous drug, and you know it. It was about spreading propaganda and disinformation to make it look like you were saving society from the "devil weed." In the process, you demonized pot smokers and treated some of them as though they were major drug fiends who would become like Justin Bourque.

The truth is, Bourque — and the celebrity Amanda Bynes — are rare cases of THC psychosis caused by the intricate interaction between THC and stress on the human mind, and would clear up had the person just moderated their THC intake.

In short, "less is more" as in "less pot results in more control over stress in one's life." High consumption of marijuana never results in less stress since it is a fallacy to assume THC cures stress. What it does is chill you the fuck out, but beyond a certain level of consumption that calmness leads to anxiety, and later insomnia, mania and even psychosis.

IMO this is why the hard core pot advocates will disagree with me on this. They smoke so much the mania that THC causes in high doses prevents them from understanding that high THC consumption will lead to more anxiety and might spiral out of control.

Yet one symptom of psychosis is a state of constant denial, because it is easier to deny the truth than to give up one's current grasp on reality. If we let go of our preconceived notions of reality, then we might learn something deep and meaningful about reality itself.

However, you DEA and you RCMP have failed in stopping the War on Drugs. Your only reason for continuing the war is to look like a hero and hoodwink Americans and Canadians.

In fact, by establishing yourself in Canada, you are contributing to the problem rather than solving it.

I'm sure the only reason the DEA moved to Vancouver and Toronto was to pressure PM Harper to introduce minimum sentences on marijuana possession and related nonsense.

I also suspect that certain gangs in BC formed because the strategy of placing key members of teen gangs in the same prison and youth remand centres without keeping adequate checks and balances due to the fact that youth corrections personnel have little training in self defense against violent teenaged gang members.

In short, the shortcomings of BC youth corrections combined with more violence teenagers who have been groomed to become narcissistic led to even more violent youth gangs.

As well, it is a well known fact that families were broken up over marijuana charges, due to the propaganda against cannabis.

20140331

Why we need Muslim terrorists in Canada (satire)

  1. They will assassinate drug dealers but never deal in marijuana.
  2. Sharia law will be enforced, rather than be eroded by anti-religion manifestos like in Quebec. Though the government will have to pay them off to keep their women safe from honor killing and FGM.
  3. They could be used to keep the Pakistani-Canadian gang members in check e.g. assassinate pedophile Muslims.

Seriously though, the Canadian government is going to watch these guys when they return from Syria. It's unlikely they'll be on Muslim criminals' side after becoming Salafi. Those guys are anti-drug to the point of beheading drug dealers in Syria. So, why not use our Canadian al Qaeda to take a bite out of Muslim crime in Canada? Isn't that why the Canadian government sent them to al Nusra Front in Syria in the first place? I mean, we have Canadians there fighting beside the rebels against Assad. They will eventually come home once Assad is overthrown and his army obliterated.

This is probably why no country is supplying the rebels with bigger firepower yet. If only automatic rifles and smaller arms gets to them, then it'll be easier for the Syrian military to keep them at bay. However, it would be stupid to supply them with enough firepower to wipe out Assad, because that would force China and Russia to step in. When you add to this al Qaeda forces coming out of Pakistan, it's not hard to suspect Pakistan's Islamists and Taleban are doing what comes naturally for them, since Pakistan was the staging ground for most of the Taliban of Afghanistan.

Remember: there are up to 100 Canadian al Qaeda at the moment. Think of how useful they will be cleaning up Canadian inner cities from Halifax to Toronto to Edmonton to Vancouver, keeping it free of drug dealers. Sadly though, the security experts predict they will turn to crime and blow up trains and assassinate city councils. That's only if we deny them sharia law courts. However, it's going to cost a lot of money to keep them in line.

I'm sure sending in al Qaeda to take a bite out of crime in Canada is worth it because the RCMP are doing a shitty job of it as of now. The reports of Canadians in Syria fighting for al Qaeda implies they will get tips on how to foment "revolution" in Canada when they return. However, they may also eliminate gang members who offend them, not to steal drugs but to show what happens when sharia is used against drug dealers. Our criminal gangs in Canada are out of control. Legal enforcement and the justice system only recently legislated against gang violence by criminalizing it. However, they still fight with staff in youth custody facilities.

There was a recent incident in BC where a youth detention staff member was severely injured by a suspected teenaged gang member. I bet the government employees union is grieving that. For how can a staff member do his job if he is going to get beat up or killed at work?

While turning Canadian al Qaeda into anti-drug squad is fraught with the risk of death and injury, the risk of death and injury is prevalent in the lifestyle of gang members. The Surrey Six who died needlessly is a case in point.

When you start assassinating your rivals for horning in on your territory, then you are acting in a psychopathic manner that is contrary to the safety and security of law-abiding citizens like the two guys who were pulled in and murdered in cold blood, merely for being witnesses. Instead of targeting the State (the US government) for depriving their gangs of cocaine from Mexican cartels, gangsters in Vancouver plotted to kill off gang rivals in the big fight to distribute the dwindling supply of cocaine.

Overall, the deaths of four gang members and two innocent bystanders is a senseless waste of lives and of time. It was done because one gang tried to extort a "fee" from rival gang members to deal in their territory. When the rivals wouldn't pay up, they were executed. If Canadian al Qaeda are added to this, gang members could hire their services to wipe out other gangs.

However, the risk would be that the al Aqaeda would wipe them out if they don't convert to Islam and fight for the greater good of the imminent Caliphate. Islamists like this will threaten the group dynamics in the prison system if arrested and incarcerated with the general population.

You will see prisoners converting to Islam because the Islamists will protect you to the death. This is happening in the UK right now. It's only a matter of time before it occurs in Canada.


Originally posted: March 27, 2014 3:52 AM

References:
Syria is a training ground for Canadian homegrown terrorists.
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2014/02/21/officials-al-qaeda-tries-to-recruit-americans-in-syria/

We have Canadians in Syria fighting alongside the rebels against Assad:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/damian-clairmont-killed-fighting-with-al-qaeda-linked-rebels-in-syria-1.2497513

Inspiration for this article:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/24/fbi-agent-ibragim-todashev-boston-marathon-report

20131226

Disinformation about Grow-ops in Canada Fueled By Anti-Marijuana Propaganda (satire)

When you look over the statistics about marijuana grow-ops in Canada, the follow three facts become apparent:

  1. One in twenty grow-ups in Canada are related to gangs and criminal activity.
  2. 6 percent of all grow-ups have guns.
  3. Police overestimate the number of grow-up by 100 percent — if police estimate 100 grow-ops in a city, then there actually only 50.
Apparently the Ministry of Justice ignores these facts and the Harper government justified the harsher marijuana laws in the Narcotics Control Act by acting on the disinformation the police presented regarding grow-ops. Thus the result of such laws is to criminalize 95 percent of grow-ops, which are mom and pop operations. As well, 94 percent of grow-ops are clean of firearms. Yet both the mainstream media and the police routine claim otherwise, in order to justify harsh penalties in the section of the Narcotics Control Act regarding marijuana. Therefore the marijuana laws are based on fallacies perpetuated by the various police forces across Canada. Thus they are based on propaganda not facts. For our elected politicians base their decisions about marijuana based on #propaganda that over-inflates of the facts about marijuana grow-ops. Therefore the marijuana laws are based on hyperbole not truth. In essence, the mass media news outlets and police forces in Canada ignore and suppress the truth about grow-ops to justify marijuana prohibition. A law based on fallacies is a law that profits the State and penalizes the People unjustly. Hiding the truth about marijuana grow-ops scares the one-percent so much that their anti-marijuana lobbyists contribute to the cultural genocide of harmless marijuana advocates, most of whom are law-abiding citizens with no ties to gangs. Taxpayers are being duped into thinking marijuana grow-ops are criminal operations, when only 5 percent of grow-ops are run by gangs, and only 6 percent of all grow-op cases are associated with firearms. IMO the only purpose of the anti-marijuana hype is to make it seem as though the Harper government is doing something about gangs and criminal activity associated with marijuana. It only proves the continued criminalization of marijuana will continue to be a game of political one-upmanship. For the disinformation about marijuana grow-ops in Canada — especially in British Columbia — is fuelled by the anti-marijuana propaganda machine consisting of mass media news outlets and police forces across Canada.
Media and police not talking straight about pot: http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Media+police+forces+talking+straight+says+researcher/9324592/story.html

20090303

White Collar Crime Endemic in Canada

These banks do most of it:

BMO, RBC, CIBC, TD, and Scotia Bank

Their facilitator is PwC, and are aided and abetted by crooked lawyers and judges, provincial governments, local police and the RCMP.

Thus it makes sense to choose a Credit Union such as Vancity.

20071115

Cops Lied When Robert Dziekanski Died

The video shows the cops shock Robert Dziekanski three times but supposedly one Taser was used twice. As well, both cops use their Tasers.

The video shows that four officers were present, while the cops contend that there were three.

This is proof that they lied to save their asses and that their real motive in keeping the video was to continue to lie and offer only their version of events.

As well, the officers agreed to use Tasers only, despite the fact that the man was no threat to anyone and that an interpreter could have been called at any time because the airport knew he was from Poland and so did Customs.


This death did not have to happen, but was carefully planned and orchestrated. As well, it was a knee-jerk response with a conspiracy to use a Taser when the situation never called for it.

In essence, Robert Dziekanski was murdered by the Canadian government and all the events leading to his death were due to the bungling of both the airport (for not getting an interpreter) and the RCMP (who never considered any other method other than use of Tasers).

Suddenly I do not feel safe around the RCMP anymore.

20071027

Taser Abuse Led to Man's Death

Taser use was not indicated regarding the deceased since he had not threatened any person, not even the cops.

Rather the cops considered him to be a threat, and reacted to a situation in which they were ignorant of him being in that part of the airport for 10 hours.

As well, the airport had no policy to ensure landed immigrants get in contact with their sponsors quickly. Language barriers prevented this, and this makes me wonder why no on thought to contact a member of the Polish community to help the deceased.

So essentially, Canada killed the deceased through its agents, the police, for being hostile and threatening to the State.

Vancouver Airport owes the deceased's mother compensation and the RCMP should apologize and stop pretending it didn't do anything wrong.

20070912

Air1 Has Been Busy


>

Since its arrival in airways over Metro Vancouver February 13, 2006, the Air1 helicopter has been busy. However, the Air1 and Air2 website has documented success stories up to October 2012.

Recently Air1 has been spotted hovering over a suspected crack house in mid-August 2007. This occurred the week after a shooting at the notorious Byrd Pub at 108th Avenue and King George Highway followed by more shooting from a dwelling on 108th Avenue near 130th Street. Yet the RCMP media website has not documented this shooting at all.

From this lack of publicity, it can only be assumed that RCMP's investigation into the matter is on-going and not a probable threat to the neighbourhood since it is clear evidence of intergang warfare.

Let us hope Metro Vancouver gangsters obey Tupac Amuro Shakur's Thug Life code of ethics seriously and refrain from needlessly involving innocent citizen naive to crime in Surrey.


---
Update 201211-07: Recently Air1 was involved in tracking the break-and-enter of Gibb's Nursery in Langley.

20070724

Big Pharma and Sugar Kills More than Illegal Drugs Do

More deaths are attributable to pharmaceuticals than to illegal drugs.

Indeed, there is no epidemic of illegal drug use.

Research has shown that LSD helps autistic kids to communicate better, that MDMA in a therapeutic setting is more effective than a lifetime of psychotropic drugs for mental illness, and that marijuana is more effective in reducing the effects of anorexia than psychiatric medication.

The only reason why the Canadian Medical Association is against illegal drug decriminalization is because of the loss of profits of pĥarmaceuticals. Even the anticipated surge of drug use would not be as high as they predict.

Thus the reason illegal drugs are illegal is because Big Pharma would rather drug addicts be placed on their medications until they become dependent on psychotropics.

However, Big Pharma also provides drugs which are legitimate and more likely to kill people, when not used as directed.

Although the same logic applies to illegal drugs, legal drugs such as alcohol and tobacco are used more often and have killed more people. Even the overconsumption of sugar has lead to cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity, which kill more people than illegal drugs.

Decriminalization of illegal drugs is better than the current system in place for the profit of the State. For drug addiction is a medical problem, and illegal drugs should be decriminalized precisely because their prohibition has only contributed to drug-related crime (home invasions and theft).

It might not look as pretty as now, but police resources are better spent reducing the harm drug abuse causes rather than perpetuating the myth that illegal drugs are more dangerous than legal ones.